WWE The Bash - Randy Orton vs. Triple H - WWE Championship

RaiZ-R · 06-18-2009, 01:27 PM

So we had Triple return and beat the crap out of Orton. We then had Orton regain the Title with the current Champion not even involved in the match, and Triple H failing to foil him. We then had Triple H win a ten man Battle Royal after a gruelling four man match for the Title, even though the best decision would have been to keep Hunter away from Orton, at least until Night Of Champions/Summerslam whichever's first in order to create some kind of reason for the pairs fued to continue. Now we'll see a Last Man Standing match for freeon the next Raw and then we'll see another match the following Sunday.

I see Triple H defending at The Bash.

Necro · 06-23-2009, 01:12 AM

Updated with new match details.

Tommy Platinum · 06-23-2009, 01:29 AM

Just in case you hadn't seen enough of Orton and Triple H, here's 3 matches back to back.
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 20 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Necro · 06-23-2009, 01:30 AM

Ehh their last match on Raw certainly proves they can put on a good match. This should be solid.

Tommy Platinum · 06-23-2009, 01:33 AM

It is just boring beyond belief at this stage though. I'm sure it will be semi-watchable, but as well as the fact that the feud was played out ages ago, the 3 stages of hell will expose WWE's PGness once again, because that sort of match could really use some blood...

On the plus side, at least they arn't having a regular match on PPV following on from a Last Man Standing on RAW.

I just hope this is the feud over, but knowing WWE we can expect a Hell in a Cell eventually.

Bigpapa42 · 06-23-2009, 02:09 AM

They could put on a 5-star match and it would still feel tired. There is no reason for us to still be getting this feud. I simply don't understand the logic of the booking here.

Jasmine · 06-23-2009, 07:07 AM

The only thing I'm worried about with this match is how much it might take from others, especially since other matches depend on time to make it 'good'. Three matches with them, one of them being FCA? Stretcher? I imagine they'll make it shorter as they go by, but eh. Nevertheless, marking for their 3SOH =).

Y 2 Jake · 06-23-2009, 07:42 AM

I suppose it's better than a straight wrestling match. The only problem I have is that it'll be way too long. It must be a Triple H thing. He insisted on 20 plus minutes with Batista at WrestleMania 21. I imagine the same thing will happen here.

The stretcher stipulation is intresting. You'd imagine that one of them wouldn't be around for a couple of weeks after. It's also strange how the Stretchermatch has generally been used for mid card matches. I think it shows that WWE has used up most of their gimmick match options over the past couple of months.