King of the heel turn?

neXus · 03-29-2009, 05:33 PM

We have a problem ine the Jericho/ Legends match. WWE cant exactly have Jericho job to a bunch of people who will never work full time in the WWE again. However, WWE cant exactly have Jericho cleanly destroy three legends like they were nothing. However, WWE does have Jerry Lawler suddenly interjecting into this storyline. He didnt help Flair on Raw when Jericho was just destroying him, though Jerry did act tough once it was all over. How likely do you think it is the Jerry Lawler will turn on the legends at Wrestlemania, also bringing back that heel vs face scene in commentary?

CGS · 03-29-2009, 05:43 PM

I would love to see Heel Lawler return but there is a 99.9% chance of that not happening. Plus I'm Pretty sure that Jericho is gonna end up jobbing to the Legends in this match. There is no way i could see him winning this.

Mark Bradford · 03-29-2009, 05:45 PM

I agree with chuckz, its a nice idea of Lawler turning heel, but I doubt it will happen.

Dj1223 · 03-29-2009, 06:17 PM

If they were to run with this angle, Jerry would have to be an on-screen character again plus an announcer. I just don't see them doing that again.

neXus · 03-29-2009, 06:22 PM

No he wouldnt because you wouldnt see those three legends the next night on Raw. Jerry would just revert back to the 90's when he used to support the heels.

Dj1223 · 03-29-2009, 06:35 PM

He would have to explain his actions and the WWE won't take air time away from other storylines for him to do so. And he doesn't necessarily support the heels when announcing. The announces for the most part have to disagree so that they don't sway the crowd any specific way, but from time to time, Lawler will support the face and even get involved. For him to flip the script like that and be involved in an upper-midcard feud, it would be stupid on WWE's part not to capitalize on that by sending him right back to the annoucner's chair without doing something else with him.

neXus · 03-29-2009, 06:49 PM

When he sits down with Cole, every knows Cole will be on his ass about it. King will explain his actions during the ppv of course. Then he can also restate them after the highlights the next night on Raw. It shouldnt take him more than 5 sentences in all honesty. I wasnt talking about Kings announcing style now, I said in the 90's. Whenever Vince McMahon would be attack King would be outraged, and anything the corporation did he would try and defend. He was a heels supporter, Jim Ross would be the face supporter.

Dj1223 · 03-29-2009, 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by neXus
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 20 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

When he sits down with Cole, every knows Cole will be on his ass about it. King will explain his actions during the ppv of course. Then he can also restate them after the highlights the next night on Raw. It shouldnt take him more than 5 sentences in all honesty. I wasnt talking about Kings announcing style now, I said in the 90's. Whenever Vince McMahon would be attack King would be outraged, and anything the corporation did he would try and defend. He was a heels supporter, Jim Ross would be the face supporter.

I said that. One has to support the face and the other has to support the heel. And you can't have a huge heel turn on the biggest PPV of the year be regulated to 5 sentences of explanation and nothing else. That makes no sense.

neXus · 03-29-2009, 07:47 PM

Its just King stating he agrees with Jericho, and then they move on. Stop treating this as if it John Cena turning heel.

Dj1223 · 03-29-2009, 09:31 PM

I'm not. Stop treating this as if it's OVW. No heel turn in an upper-midcard match/feud should be regulated to 5 sentences and then pushed to the side.

King of the heel turn?

This is a discussion on King of the heel turn? within the WWE Pay Per View forums, part of the Wrestling Forums category; We have a problem ine the Jericho/ Legends match. WWE cant exactly have Jericho job to a bunch of people ...