|
|
WWE Discussion Discussions of Raw, Smackdown and ECW. Also weekly live discussions. |
|
| Welcome to the Wrestling Clique Wrestling Forums. |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() |
|
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #11 (permalink) | |
|
Indy Moderator
Indy's one and only!!
![]() Status: Offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,649
vBookie Cash: 500
Rep Power: 14 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Tut Tut WWE lol .. | |
![]() http://wrestlingclique.com/general-p...wrestling.html Take your daily dose of Indy Wrestling, Doctors orders. ROH Take No Prisoners just added !!! ![]() | ||
| | #12 (permalink) | |
| Set Trippin'
![]() Status: Offline
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 26,296
vBookie Cash: 12657
Rep Power: 78 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Tut Tut WWE Yeah, I meant besides him lol. I could go on and on with guys that not only left WCW and ECW and were brought into WWE with their previous name, but they also used their exact gimmicks.. I don't understand this concept about how "If Vince didn't create something, then he'll shit all over it.." It's another internet myth. | |
| | #13 (permalink) | |
|
Indy Moderator
Indy's one and only!!
![]() Status: Offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,649
vBookie Cash: 500
Rep Power: 14 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Tut Tut WWE Yeah its B's cause thats what the said about Punk and stuff, and it blows | |
![]() http://wrestlingclique.com/general-p...wrestling.html Take your daily dose of Indy Wrestling, Doctors orders. ROH Take No Prisoners just added !!! ![]() | ||
| | #14 (permalink) | ||
|
Super Moderator
Rock out wit cha Knockout
Status:
Online
Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 9,195
vBookie Cash: 260000
Rep Power: 60 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Tut Tut WWE Quote:
![]() After the first week of the InVasion angle, when did WCW look like a treath? WCW was made to look very weak & the biggest example is the final match featured at least two WWE guys on Team WCW (Austin & Angle) Didnt shit all over it eh? | ||
![]() I dont want to take what you can give... I would rather starve than eat your bread... I would rather run but I cant walk... Guess Ill lie alone just like before... | |||
| | #15 (permalink) | |
| Set Trippin'
![]() Status: Offline
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 26,296
vBookie Cash: 12657
Rep Power: 78 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Tut Tut WWE What did you want them to do? Yeah, the Invasion angle sucked.. Yeah.. the wCw guys were made to look like shit, but that's becasue they WERE shit for the most part.. They should have held off until they could sign all the big names. Goldberg? He won the heavyweight title. It's not WWE's fault that the fans didn't care about him anymore.. I was in Worcester. Rock was over. Goldberg wasn't. Booker T later became a world heavyweight champion as well. Ric Flair just got the biggest send off the world has ever seen.. Is he a WWE guy? | |
| | #17 (permalink) | |
| Obama owes me $10 ![]() Status: Offline
Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: "O'er the land of the free, and the home of the SOONERS!!!"
Posts: 1,046
vBookie Cash: 995
Rep Power: 11 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Tut Tut WWE To be fair, Rated R Phenom did say "unless you're a mega star". It's arguable whether or not you want to consider guys like Booker T, Eddie Guerrero, Rey Mysterio, Tazz, RVD, etc to be "mega stars", but people definitely knew who they were and would have noticed if there names had been changed. I'm thinking that, for instance, Chris Harris, will have a different name whenever he debuts. As for Matt Sydal, I think it's a little wetoddid to have him debut under..."Matt Sydal", and then give him another name the very next week. Unless of course they are actually trying an amnesia gimmick. ...which I think would be equally as lame. The reason there's never been a successful amnesia gimmick is because it's a horrible idea. | |
| | #18 (permalink) | |
| Set Trippin'
![]() Status: Offline
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 26,296
vBookie Cash: 12657
Rep Power: 78 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Tut Tut WWE I wouldn't call the Dudley Boyz, Raven, CM Punk, Tazz, or any of those guys mega stars.. but I guess it can be argued.. Personally, I don't care what his name is. I like him and if they give him a nice little push, I'd be happy with that.. | |
| | #19 (permalink) | ||
| You like that don'tcha
![]() Status:
Online
Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Gated residence 40 miles outside London.
Posts: 16,944
vBookie Cash: 100
Rep Power: 97 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Tut Tut WWE Quote:
I'm also thinking he himself likely doesn't care a jot as long as he's on national TV, so why should we? As long as he's not this generations Gobbledegooker, we're all happy! | ||
| | #20 (permalink) | ||
| Obama owes me $10 ![]() Status: Offline
Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: "O'er the land of the free, and the home of the SOONERS!!!"
Posts: 1,046
vBookie Cash: 995
Rep Power: 11 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Tut Tut WWE Quote:
That's the ring name he's gone by for years. Although it's not the only name he has used, pretty much anyone who has seem him wrestle before knows him as Matt Sydal, not just "wrasslin' geeks". Even people who saw him for the first time last week on ECW should know him as Matt Sydal, because that's what they called him last week, as dumb as that was. | ||