|
|
WWE Discussion Discussions of Raw, Smackdown and ECW. Also weekly live discussions. |
|
| Welcome to the Wrestling Clique Wrestling Forums. |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() |
|
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #22 (permalink) | |
| Freakshow Extraordinaire
![]() Status: Offline
Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Down At The Bottom Of The Garden, Among The Birds & The Bees.
Posts: 2,197
vBookie Cash: 300
Rep Power: 20 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Triple H helping or hurting WWE? I mean, it's so obviously a John Cena belt. It has his padlock on the sideplates, for crying out loud! I always thought it should have been akin to the Smokin' Skull belt, in that it was only held by Austin. And it's definitely odd when you consider JBL's destruction of the spinning US Title. You'd think someone like Orton would take pleasure in doing a similar thing. | |
![]() Tomorrow's Just An Excuse Away, So I Pull My Collar Up And Face The Cold, On My Own. The Earth Laughs Beneath My Heavy Feet, At The Blasphemy In My Old Jangly Walk. | ||
| | #23 (permalink) | ||
| Your Sexyweight Champion
![]() Status: Offline
Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Tampa Bay
Posts: 7,115
vBookie Cash: 100
Rep Power: 33 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Triple H helping or hurting WWE? Quote:
| ||
![]() | |||
| | #24 (permalink) | |
| And Now You Know
Status: Offline
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 180
vBookie Cash: 500
Rep Power: 2 ![]() ![]() | Re: Triple H helping or hurting WWE? When you look at the WWE title you can't help but think about Cena.Apparently it cause money to keep changing the World title belt.Only one that really added something to it was Edge. Which it had a Rated R sign. So all they could do is have one title for everyone. And just that one for John Cena.You wouldn't want every wrestler now wanting his own belt. Unless every wrestler that want's a different belt pays for there own. But that would be weird and it'll only create a bad habit among wrestlers. Last edited by factum1; 05-02-2008 at 02:48 AM. Reason: mistake | |
| | #25 (permalink) | ||
|
WC's Resident Redneck
Deo Vindice
![]() Status:
Online
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: West Virginia
Posts: 13,123
vBookie Cash: 18179
Rep Power: 55 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Triple H helping or hurting WWE? Quote:
They should just go back to some classic, respectable design. | ||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
| |||
| | #26 (permalink) | |
| And Now You Know
Status: Offline
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 180
vBookie Cash: 500
Rep Power: 2 ![]() ![]() | Re: Triple H helping or hurting WWE? But for Cena,it just wouldn't be the same without his belt. For the prestige of the World Title you might be right,but they shouldn't give the title to Vince again like they gave vince the ECW title.Or they gave the World title to Khali instead of Kane who's been in the WWE for a long time.Khali has been made a joke after he won it.Which is what usually happens to guys who are just pushed because of there size and strength.Like Earthquake,King kong bundy,snitsky etc.Umaga,but he's a much better wrestler,but i don't think the WWE is ever planting to make World Champion.About Umaga,he was put faced for a small while, that didn't last long because HHH needed a heel to beat up on again.That was why they brought in guys like Snitsky from ECW. Next time it could be,Festus or Vladimir Kozlov.They enter the WWE winning alot. like they'll do with Vladimir even though they never plan to make him World Champion.which they would if it were the old days where they pushed guys like Yokosuna.But i believe they could give him the title if he's good enough in the ring. Instead of just giving it to just the popular wrestlers.If they gave it to Khali they sure could give it to him.Even though Khali only was giving the title becuase of an injured wrestler,which i can't remember who it was now.So many world champions geting injured.Taker,Batista,Mysterio,and Edge which i now think it was him.Yep.Anyway that's that. About HHH hurting the WWE again,always.Unless your not interested in him being in the spotlight with or without the title. and not interested in the WWE pushing young for world title matches after they decline in there wrestling ability shape or even there look.So if your cheering a new champion it may not be too long before he starts looking old.what good would it be to wrestlers be pushed too late so they could start looking like HBK,I know wrestling isn't real,but if you look at other sports there are young athletes who are the top superstars.And don't have to be in there 33 years of age or older to be champions or be the best. It only done in wrestling where you see the guys in there 45 like Taker and HBK winning or being the world champs.I guess you have to be in your's 50 to retire.That's just great let push all the rest till there 50 or like flair till there 60.So if flair could beat Kennedy and HBK could beat batista right now.Anyone could be Champions that's just adding real credibility and prestige to the world title.In the old days wrestling was made to look real.But now there's just no surprise that anyone could be champion.And much less Tag Team champions. And there's one guy that think's he just better than the other's becuase he has given the belt to himself more times.just like his Pal Nash was a booker gave himself the title and defeated the undeafeated Goldberg at the time.I guess that all runs in the clique.So i'll follow up these words again from Christian Cage. So if you didn't know. Well now you know.(can't help it, that's just sounds cool) | |
| | #27 (permalink) | |
| WWE Addict
Status: Offline
Join Date: May 2008 Location: PEI, Canada
Posts: 51
vBookie Cash: 1100
Rep Power: 1 ![]() | Re: Triple H helping or hurting WWE? Triple H is a HUGE asset to the WWE. He is an awesome wrestler and in great shape to boot. There is a lot of no talent losers showing up on RAW, Smackdown and ECW these days. They need to keep those that are worth keeping, and HHH is definetly one of those people. I am glad that he won't go to Smackdown, Raw wouldn't be the same without him. The only reason that Smackdown still sells out is because of Taker. Yeah Edge is pretty big, but there aren't many who'd pay big bucks to see him in "action". Honestly, I think they should just take Taker, Edge and maybe Batista and just go to one brand. Smackdown is dying more and more each week. And ECW has simply turned into a joke. I was so digusted when I saw someone get DQ'ed on ECW. It is supposed to be EXTREME. Anyway, my basic point is that The Game is a huge asset to the WWE and to Raw. He totally deserved to win the title at Backlash this year. And just for the record, I am probably alone in saying this, but I enjoy Triple H as a face more then a heel, lmao. | |
| | #28 (permalink) | |
|
Super Moderator
Rock out wit cha Knockout
Status: Offline
Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 8,422
vBookie Cash: 300000
Rep Power: 44 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Triple H helping or hurting WWE? I might be alone with this but the rare time i watch WWE, i'll only watch Smackdown. The only time i watch Raw is if its a special. The last time was the Wrestlemania rewind thing. Smackdown for the majority of matches is far more entertaining. Of course there are exceptions like Khali matches but i'd rather watch Edge or Chavo Geurrero or even Festus & Jesse than John Cena, Triple H or Hardcore Holly & Cody Rhodes. Raw cant compete with Smackdown when it comes to match quality. Raw only has Michaels, London, Kendrick & a handful of others. Most of Smackdown can give you a good match. | |
![]() ![]() | ||
| | #29 (permalink) | |
| WWE Addict
Status: Offline
Join Date: May 2008 Location: PEI, Canada
Posts: 51
vBookie Cash: 1100
Rep Power: 1 ![]() | Re: Triple H helping or hurting WWE? I am totally opposite. I rarely watch SD unless there is a Taker match or something interesting happening. I find that the matches are just boring and repetitive. I watch Raw religiously but SD isn't usually worth 2.5 hours of my time....haha. They seriously need more talent. I think it is time for another tuff enough lmao. | |
| | #30 (permalink) | |
| And Now You Know
Status: Offline
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 180
vBookie Cash: 500
Rep Power: 2 ![]() ![]() | Re: Triple H helping or hurting WWE Bad WWE doesn't care enough about any brand,just Raw and if you you open your eyes to what's been going on the last 5 years you could tell that. WWE is control by all in the family including HHH. And if anyone read what i wrote before will notice that. The reason the King of the Ring was done from the 3 brands was so they could just take it away from SmackDown and make a Raw wrestler the King of the Ring because HHH wanted Regal to be king just to make his storyline with him. So if HHH want's a wrestler which to feud with they bring him. If HHH want's an SmackDown PPV like the King of the Ring they bring it. If he wan'ts to chooose the winner it's done. If he wan'ts to feud with him it's a go.If he wan't the Winner of the King of the Ring to win it out of a PPV it's done. (1st time ever King of the ring was not celebrated at the PPV) And the quickest done King of the ring so it could all be set for his storyline. If you wan't to know more fact's just read the rest i wrote. He used to be in awful shape ,doesn't matter who ever wan't to like him will like him. Who ever wan'ts to hate him then they'll hate him. So he will always be defended or accused. But there's a small part that care's about the what's really going on. Just thinK about what i wrote before.It's easy to like guys who the WWE makes look good Many in which didn't seem to be good enough till they left WCW to the WWF. And many legends that left the WWF showed that it was all politics because those younger stars quickly rose to the top. There some legends that don't deserve it there some rookies that don't deserve to be at the top, but there lot's of ego either way.And if guys continue to only help themselves others will eventually leave. Some just too late.So if you think that whole mess about the king of the ring is coincidence and the rest i wrote do so.I only say these things to give a chance for people to understand and if one person could tell ,then he maybe could see more things on his own.It's like magic if you believe in all of it you'll never see the trick. | |
![]() |
| Tags |
| hhh, raw, triple h, wwe |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| | |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Live Raw Thread- Is Triple H Next? | Mr. Kennedy | WWE Discussion | 116 | 08-07-2006 11:10 PM |
| Live Raw Thread- Triple H Puckers Up | Mr. Kennedy | WWE Discussion | 261 | 06-05-2006 11:14 PM |
| Live Raw Thread:Triple H vs.Big Show vs. RVD | Slimdust | Wrestling News & Rumors | 144 | 02-20-2006 11:06 PM |
| The Triple H appreciation thread. | Danny Diamond | WWE Discussion | 17 | 06-14-2005 11:51 PM |