This makes sense...

CrasH - X · 11-30-2006, 01:38 AM

Yes the Hardys are teaming together again, it's awesome, but when will the WWE actually announce Matt is a member of the RAW roster now, or Jeff on SD!. Let us know.

Because right now, as it stands, this Sunday ECW will be premiering it's PPV event "December to Dismember", which holds the match between Jeff Hardy (RAW) and Matt Hardy(SmackDown!) vs Johnny Nitro(RAW) and Joey Mercury(SD!).

We need some sort of clarity.

thirty7 · 11-30-2006, 05:47 AM

What are you on about? You're acting as if there's meant to be some kind of brand extension happening :p

Blitzkrieg · 11-30-2006, 06:57 AM

What's a brand extension? Seriously, they need to just end it. I'm tired of all the loopholes, and I'm really tired of things like this that go unexplained.

CrasH - X · 11-30-2006, 01:22 PM

At least mention Joey as an extrimist, that would make a little sense as to why these four are on the ECW PPV. It would also give reason why MNM is just a one night thing.
But they probably won't.

WackoJako · 11-30-2006, 01:32 PM

The Bran extension is kind of a bad thing but at this point it can't end. There's so many established guys, due to having 3 sperate brands that if you brought them all together you'd have way too many guys to get on tv, much the reason WWE specials like SNME phail.

CrasH - X · 11-30-2006, 02:40 PM

I don't understand the Brand Extention thing.
All I'm saying is why, without explaination, would the WWE have a member on each RAW and SmackDown! team against two more guys 1 from RAW and the other supposedly from SmackDown! on an exclusive ECW brand PPV.
Why not wait for these guys to do it at New Years Resolution? At least it's a RAW PPV and would make a bit more sense (Jeff and Johnny are RAW members).

God · 11-30-2006, 03:48 PM

you really think they remember past stories, even something as big as the brand extenstion.

WackoJako · 11-30-2006, 05:43 PM

The Hardyz vs MNM makes no sense. It's just a case of ECW doesn't have enough matches to fill a full card, and the Nitro Hardy feud has been going on long enough they decided to add it here I guess. It's cool how they palyed it out " Both Nitro and Jeff reuniting with their past" if you will, it just happened at the wrong time. ( An all ECW show when none are from there)

Reinheimer · 11-30-2006, 09:23 PM

I don't know if Joey Mercury is on a particular brand. We haven't seen him on WWE television in over six months. The match itself is just one of those special match ups. It has been noted quite alot that MNM and Team Xtreme's reuniting aren't permanent. At the moment, Jeff Hardy is the Intercontinental Champion, so I don't think he'll start teaming with Matt Hardy on a more regular basis. You will notice that alot of wrestlers have been appearing on the other wrestling brands lately. It's just all about promoting everything. The Survivor Series part of the year is very good this, and the WWE done the exact same thing last year. One the Royal Rumble or New Years Revolution comes around, things will start getting back to normal.

JadedX · 12-01-2006, 02:43 AM

I think the whole reason for The Hardyz open challenge, was too get an reaction from TNA. And if that was the case, believe you me, it so worked. I know the last thing WWE want's is give any attention to TNA, but think about it, they've been doing the open challenges for sometime now, starting with Kurt Angle. The whole purpose of that was too get an reaction from the UFC, which it did. They never retaliated, or made mention of what was the UFC's reaction, just like they won't make mention of what TNA's reaction was, which we all should know by now. In my opinion, and if it was in fact the WWE's plan all along too get somekind of lame reaction from TNA, then not only did they get what they wanted, but they also proved how too get, what you want. Whereas TNA has been going all out too get somekind of reaction from the WWE, and has yet too happen. Lesson well learned, boys.

As for the explaination of why the Hardyz on ECW? Who's on RAW, Who's on SD!? Why a RAW wrestler is on SD!? And vice versa. Simple, I wouldn't know. WWE tends too do the unexplainable. Go figure.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Scary but it all makes sense now.	Danny Diamond	General Discussion	6	07-25-2006 07:39 PM
We don't make sense..	Blitzkrieg	General Discussion	7	01-18-2006 04:53 PM
Hometown Changes: It All Makes Sense Now...	Y2J The King Of The World	WWE Discussion	11	04-07-2004 12:08 PM

11-30-2006, 01:32 PM	#5 (permalink)
WackoJako Platinum Member Status: Offline Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Portsmouth, VA Posts: 1,273 vBookie Cash: 738 Rep Power: 7 gXboxLive Leaderboard: 14^th Awards Showcase Total Awards: 1	The Bran extension is kind of a bad thing but at this point it can't end. There's so many established guys, due to having 3 sperate brands that if you brought them all together you'd have way too many guys to get on tv, much the reason WWE specials like SNME phail.

11-30-2006, 05:43 PM	#8 (permalink)
WackoJako Platinum Member Status: Offline Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Portsmouth, VA Posts: 1,273 vBookie Cash: 738 Rep Power: 7 gXboxLive Leaderboard: 14^th Awards Showcase Total Awards: 1	The Hardyz vs MNM makes no sense. It's just a case of ECW doesn't have enough matches to fill a full card, and the Nitro Hardy feud has been going on long enough they decided to add it here I guess. It's cool how they palyed it out " Both Nitro and Jeff reuniting with their past" if you will, it just happened at the wrong time. ( An all ECW show when none are from there)

12-01-2006, 02:43 AM	#10 (permalink)
JadedX Senior Monk Status: Offline Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Hawaii Posts: 134 vBookie Cash: 500 Rep Power: 2	I think the whole reason for The Hardyz open challenge, was too get an reaction from TNA. And if that was the case, believe you me, it so worked. I know the last thing WWE want's is give any attention to TNA, but think about it, they've been doing the open challenges for sometime now, starting with Kurt Angle. The whole purpose of that was too get an reaction from the UFC, which it did. They never retaliated, or made mention of what was the UFC's reaction, just like they won't make mention of what TNA's reaction was, which we all should know by now. In my opinion, and if it was in fact the WWE's plan all along too get somekind of lame reaction from TNA, then not only did they get what they wanted, but they also proved how too get, what you want. Whereas TNA has been going all out too get somekind of reaction from the WWE, and has yet too happen. Lesson well learned, boys. As for the explaination of why the Hardyz on ECW? Who's on RAW, Who's on SD!? Why a RAW wrestler is on SD!? And vice versa. Simple, I wouldn't know. WWE tends too do the unexplainable. Go figure.

This makes sense...

Discussions of Raw, Smackdown and ECW. Also weekly live discussions.