|
|
WWE Discussion Discussions of Raw, Smackdown and ECW. Also weekly live discussions. |
|
| Welcome to the Wrestling Clique Wrestling Forums. |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() |
|
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #31 (permalink) | ||
| Formerly "Tom Dogg"
![]() Status: Offline
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: New York City
Posts: 11,515
vBookie Cash: 100
Rep Power: 46 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Quote:
Also, when Fox agrees to air 24, they know ahead of time that it's a show that involved terrorists. NBC knows ahead of time that Law & Order deals with murders. UPN agreed to air Smackdown under the impression that it is a show where large, athletic men fight each other, with somewhat risque storylines. They didnt sign on for a show where Islamic extremists sacrifice and martyr themselves (a la suicide bombers), while a group of men who look like terrorists choke a man with piano wire. This kinda thing doesnt belong on a wrestling program. I cant really explain why...it just doesnt | ||
| | |||
|
| | #32 (permalink) | |
| The King of "Old School"
Status: Offline
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,543
vBookie Cash: 500
Rep Power: 6 ![]() | I think alot of stuff that WWE does, does not belong on a wrestling program. | |
| Get yourself an old wrestling tape. Watch Flair in his prime, Terry Funk, The Road Warriors, Dusty Rhodes, Ricky Steamboat, Barry Windham, The Andersons, Pat Patterson, The Briscoes, and I dare you,... I dare you to try to tell me that WWE is even a remotely good product. Wrestling happened before 1998 and just because you didn't see it does not mean it did not exist. Broaden your horizons people!!! | ||
|
| | #33 (permalink) | |
| Set Trippin'
![]() Status: Offline
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 26,574
vBookie Cash: 12657
Rep Power: 85 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Whether you guys like it or not, wrestling is not going back to the days of Wrestler A challenges Wrestler B to a title match, they agree and then fight. And it's not going back to the Sat. morning shows with all the storylines for ages 8-14.. They have their fanbase now which is mostly made up of young adults, and for the most part these people want to see risque storylines involving more than a simple challenge. | |
|
| | #35 (permalink) | |
| Set Trippin'
![]() Status: Offline
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 26,574
vBookie Cash: 12657
Rep Power: 85 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Well..I don't know which brand that write is on, but one thing I can be sure of is that the risque storylines aren't going anywhere... Maybe SD! will become a show for kids, but in no way is that happening to RAW...I don't see it. | |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| | |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Y2J's departure... | Slimdust | WWE Discussion | 29 | 09-25-2007 09:01 PM |
| WWE's web site confirms Big Show's departure | 2Slick | WWE Discussion | 10 | 12-17-2006 12:34 PM |
| It Wasn't My Fault... | thirty7 | WWE Discussion | 16 | 05-04-2005 12:55 PM |
| Orton's fall from glory: his fault or WWE's? | azrael | WWE Discussion | 13 | 02-05-2005 12:57 AM |