This is a discussion on How to Unify the WWE world titles. within the WWE Discussion forums, part of the Wrestling Forums category; Originally Posted by Y 2 Jake
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 20 ...
Welcome to Wrestling Clique Wrestling Forums
Hello and Welcome to WrestlingClique - Wrestling Forums!
We are the premier wrestling forum and your source for wrestling news and rumors, wrestling divas, wrestling gifs, sports discussion, e-feds, writing and more. Wrestling fans participate in active discussion on all the major wrestling leagues and events including WWE, ECW & TNA pay per view events, live wrestling streams, wrestling video games, collectibles, and other wrestling related products and services.
You're currently viewing our site as an unregistered guest which means you are limited to most discussions and features.
Take a few minutes to browse around, and if you like what you see, Register a free account to gain access to :
• Richer content, access forums that are not viewable by the public.
• Complete access to post topics, respond to polls, communicate privately (PM), take part contests, arcade, photo sharing, networking, groups.
• Create your personal profile and bio
• Meet and Chat Live with other members who share similar interests
Registration is simple and fast. Won't take you more than a minute and of course it's completely free.
So Join our Community today!
If I was merging, the ECW title would be merged with the IC & US.
As for the world titles, I'd simply have the two best options for the belt face off for the new unified WWE Championship. There's no need for it to be complicated.
Why merge a world title with 2 secondary titles? All that would do is the loss of both secondary belts and result in the WWE having 2 world titles and no secondary titles (the ECW Championship IS a world title and even WWE considers it one, they most recently called it son when Christian won it and they said Christian had finally won a world title).
__________________ Help out a struggling college student. Visit and shop for video games at my Amazon-based store, also get Blu-ray Discs: To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
You can also help me out by gifting me Virtual Conole/WiiWare games or sharing PSN games with me (PM me for my info)
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
This sounds interesting and finally, hopefully WWE can be one again instead of three seperate brands. The tri-brand idea worked for a while but then got stale and boring. It's definitely time to "shake things up" so to speak. So now I believe that at WM 27 because 26 is too soon to start a storyline, the champs after next years WM should start to have a feud over who is the better champ. It will be difficult to see who will be the champs by then so the creative team will have to come up with something pretty good. Then all the top guys can go after the one WWE title and this will create better and more exciting storylines just like the good ol' days.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Why merge a world title with 2 secondary titles? All that would do is the loss of both secondary belts and result in the WWE having 2 world titles and no secondary titles (the ECW Championship IS a world title and even WWE considers it one, they most recently called it son when Christian won it and they said Christian had finally won a world title).
If it's a world title and more important than those two secondardy titles, then why was it the only one of the three left of this year's Mania card?
If it was a legitimate world title it'd appear on the biggest show of the year, or at least the champion would.
Nobody considers it to be anything other than a secondary title.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Linear Mode
