If Royal Rumble has it's own PPV so should the Money In The Bank
This is a discussion on If Royal Rumble has it's own PPV so should the Money In The Bank within the WWE Discussion forums, part of the Wrestling Forums category; Well they have done it with Scramble matches, Elimination chamber and maybe HIAC aswell now. Just trying to continue their ...
Welcome to Wrestling Clique Wrestling Forums
Hello and Welcome to WrestlingClique - Wrestling Forums!
We are the premier wrestling forum and your source for wrestling news and rumors, wrestling divas, wrestling gifs, sports discussion, e-feds, writing and more. Wrestling fans participate in active discussion on all the major wrestling leagues and events including WWE, ECW & TNA pay per view events, live wrestling streams, wrestling video games, collectibles, and other wrestling related products and services.
You're currently viewing our site as an unregistered guest which means you are limited to most discussions and features.
Take a few minutes to browse around, and if you like what you see, Register a free account to gain access to :
• Richer content, access forums that are not viewable by the public.
• Complete access to post topics, respond to polls, communicate privately (PM), take part contests, arcade, photo sharing, networking, groups.
• Create your personal profile and bio
• Meet and Chat Live with other members who share similar interests
Registration is simple and fast. Won't take you more than a minute and of course it's completely free.
So Join our Community today!
Re: If Royal Rumble has it's own PPV so should the Money In The Bank
Well they have done it with Scramble matches, Elimination chamber and maybe HIAC aswell now. Just trying to continue their tradition. To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 20 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Well they have done it with Scramble matches, Elimination chamber and maybe HIAC aswell now. Just trying to continue their tradition. To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 20 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
HIAC was done to death even before this HIAC PPV was introduced lol.
As long as MITB is a one time thing, it would definitely be a draw for the PPV, especially if they cut down on ladder matches in general.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
I dunno, I think considering the top stars would be on the show in World Title matches, it would still draw good numbers. Unlike a lot of other PPVs, it would feature a match you can only see once a year.
Thats the problem right there.
The people you would pay the money to see on the PPV wouldn't be in the match that they were building the PPV around.
Its the reason Survivor Series works and why The Rumble works, the stars you want to see are in the matches the PPV is focused around.
If you advertise a PPV around MITB and then don't include the big stars in that match then it wouldn't be worth it, yeah you'd still see them on the show but it wouldn't be for the advertised match the PPV is built around.
__________________
-------------------------------------
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
-------------------------------------
Quote:
Originally Posted by James Deuce in the Shoutbox
11/20/2009 02:55 - So much false hope you have
11/20/2009 02:55 - Ill be loling at you while watching us own you
11/20/2009 02:55 - I cant wait for this game
The people you would pay the money to see on the PPV wouldn't be in the match that they were building the PPV around.
Its the reason Survivor Series works and why The Rumble works, the stars you want to see are in the matches the PPV is focused around.
If you advertise a PPV around MITB and then don't include the big stars in that match then it wouldn't be worth it, yeah you'd still see them on the show but it wouldn't be for the advertised match the PPV is built around.
No, because as I said, the very fact that you get to see MITB and you don't see it at any other PPV would make it a draw.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
No, because as I said, the very fact that you get to see MITB and you don't see it at any other PPV would make it a draw.
But you have to get the combination right.
Its why in a small way matches like Elimination Chamber and the Scramble Matches worked before they overkilled it, they featured who you were buying the PPV for.
You'd have to have people like Cena, Batista, Undertaker etc all involved in the MITB match for it to draw well enough to become a regular thing.
__________________
-------------------------------------
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
-------------------------------------
Quote:
Originally Posted by James Deuce in the Shoutbox
11/20/2009 02:55 - So much false hope you have
11/20/2009 02:55 - Ill be loling at you while watching us own you
11/20/2009 02:55 - I cant wait for this game
Its why in a small way matches like Elimination Chamber and the Scramble Matches worked before they overkilled it, they featured who you were buying the PPV for.
You'd have to have people like Cena, Batista, Undertaker etc all involved in the MITB match for it to draw well enough to become a regular thing.
What do you mean? King of the Ring didn't feature the top guys usually but it still had a PPV themed around it.
Having MITB as the main event of said PPV would just make it seem a bigger deal. You could get a balance of young up and comers and established main event talents in the match, putting over the fact that everybody wants the briefcase. I think it would work just fine.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
What do you mean? King of the Ring didn't feature the top guys usually but it still had a PPV themed around it.
Having MITB as the main event of said PPV would just make it seem a bigger deal. You could get a balance of young up and comers and established main event talents in the match, putting over the fact that everybody wants the briefcase. I think it would work just fine.
And where is the King Of The Ring now?
I'm not saying it wouldn't work i'm just saying it would need to have the bigger names to make it draw really well which is what MITB isn't for, it is for the mid card wrestlers to get their chance and if you were to centre a PPV around MITB then those stars who normally get to shine at Wrestlemania would be stuck lower down the card instead while the likes of Cena, Batista & Undertaker would get more spotlight than they already have.
And also if that were to happen, you wouldn't get the high spots you normally get with the people like Benjamin and Morrison.
__________________
-------------------------------------
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
-------------------------------------
Quote:
Originally Posted by James Deuce in the Shoutbox
11/20/2009 02:55 - So much false hope you have
11/20/2009 02:55 - Ill be loling at you while watching us own you
11/20/2009 02:55 - I cant wait for this game
It's not a case of all main eventers or all up and comers though is it....
With 8 guys I think they could definitely strike a good balance.
Something like this (just an example):
John Cena vs Shawn Michaels vs Jeff Hardy vs Jack Swagger vs Rey Mysterio vs John Morrison vs The Miz vs MVP
Are you saying that wouldn't draw?
It probably would but not as much as:
Cena vs Batista vs Undertaker vs Orton vs HHH vs Edge vs Jeff vs Michaels
Its got to be thought through logically.
Yes i'd like MITB on a seperate PPV but it would become a throw away match on that PPV and would be overshadowed by the title matches instead.
It would become another opportunity for a main eventer to get a shot at a title instead of pushing someone new into the main event from the mid card which is what MITB is for.
__________________
-------------------------------------
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
-------------------------------------
Quote:
Originally Posted by James Deuce in the Shoutbox
11/20/2009 02:55 - So much false hope you have
11/20/2009 02:55 - Ill be loling at you while watching us own you
11/20/2009 02:55 - I cant wait for this game
Cena vs Batista vs Undertaker vs Orton vs HHH vs Edge vs Jeff vs Michaels
Its got to be thought through logically.
Yes i'd like MITB on a seperate PPV but it would become a throw away match on that PPV and would be overshadowed by the title matches instead.
It would become another opportunity for a main eventer to get a shot at a title instead of pushing someone new into the main event from the mid card which is what MITB is for.
There are World Title matches you know.....
Why would you put every big name in the match anyway? If you had that MITB there would be no big title matches. You're not making any sense now.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Linear Mode
