Flair makes me so mad! - Page 3 - Wrestling Forums : WWE, TNA, ECW, E-Fed, Wrestlemania, Live Wrestling Streams

Bouchie · 04-03-2005, 01:59 PM

He lost to Taker at Survivor Series '91 as well. He lost to Yoko at KOTR '93. He'll lose to Hassan tonight too, should the match take place.

Tommy 2 Slow · 04-03-2005, 02:59 PM

If what makes a great wrestler is your technal skills in the ring, then Benoit, Bret and The Dynamite Kid are the Greatest EVER. No 1 even comes close. But its more than that. Hulk Hogan wasn't technically sound, but he is the greatest wrestler of all time.

Bouchie · 04-03-2005, 03:01 PM

Rock is a better wrestler than Hogan. He is better on the mic and his wrestling is more entertaining as well.

Tommy 2 Slow · 04-03-2005, 03:24 PM

mmmmmmm close.......either or I guess.

AudioSavior · 04-03-2005, 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Narc

mmmmmmm close.......either or I guess.

Ya, I wouldn't argue either side on that one. Although Hogan did get an insane pop last night at the HOF awards. it went on for 15 mins.

Necro · 04-03-2005, 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by I da MAN

Sure, I admit he was a great wrestler.

Sabac obiously doesn't understand what it means to be a wrestler. When Foley said that he was talking to fans like you who think that the only thing that makes someone a good wrestler is by how good technicaly they are. For true fans like me, we know better. We understand that a great wrestler is someone who has made a big impact in wrestling and is a legend. People are always saying that Hogan, THe rock, Mickey, etc can't wrestle. I don't recall the majority of fans or even the minority of fans complaining that their matches sucked lke they do when a newbie has a bad match. If they can come ut of that ring leaving fans in awe or happy, then they are a great wrestler.

I covered this in my last post and made it very clear that being a good wrestler is more than just being good technically. Nice to see you totally ignore that Sabac.

I forgot you know everything about everything. I simply meant he was a crappy wrestler as far as textbook crap. I might have been misunderstood. Jesus christ I just say he was beyond a wrestler, and people still get pissy over it...

Necro · 04-03-2005, 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by I da MAN

I covered this in my last post and made it very clear that being a good wrestler is more than just being good technically. Nice to see you totally ignore that Sabac.

Since when is your opinion bond? Jesus you make it sound like you are the last word on this. Just cause you think something doesnt mean its right. It's called having an opinion, dont get pissed that I have one. It's not hard to see that most memorable Mick Foley matches are either spot fests, or something to do with something extreme. With that said I actually find that way more interesting, than your everyday run of the mill borefest of wrestling moves, and lockups...

AudioSavior · 04-03-2005, 05:00 PM

Why is it everytime you have a reply to me you have to make the comment that I know everything? It is not my fault you say one thing and then back track or say it was just your opinion. If you are going to make statements such as yours then don't be surprised when someone calls you on it. Just because I am debating with you doesn't mean I know everything. If you wern't clear on your point then be more specific.

You are the one acting all pissy not I. If you want to include someone who is a spot fest then by your own deffinition, AJ Styles is a crappy wrestler because his matches are one big spot fest.

Necro · 04-03-2005, 05:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by I da MAN

Why is it everytime you have a reply to me you have to make the comment that I know everything? It is not my fault you say one thing and then back track or say it was just your opinion. If you are going to make statements such as yours then don't be surprised when someone calls you on it. Just because I am debating with you doesn't mean I know everything. If you wern't clear on your point then be more specific.

You are the one acting all pissy not I. If you want to include someone who is a spot fest then by your own deffinition, AJ Styles is a crappy wrestler because his matches are one big spot fest.

I will let this post speak for itself. So what Mic Foley has done matches that weren't spot fests?

AJ Styles matches aren't one big spot fests. How many of his matches have you actually seen? If you ever watched one you'd see a wrestler as techinical as Kurt Angle, and someone who can do amazing things in the ring. All Mic Foley can do is spot fests. Please tell me what else he can do seriously? Who remembers one match he's done where it hasnt been about him falling off something really high, or him getting hit in the head with a chair numerous times.

How you even try to argue that Mic Foley is more than an under average wrestler is beyond me.

AudioSavior · 04-03-2005, 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sabac

I will let this post speak for itself. So what Mic Foley has done matches that weren't spot fests?

AJ Styles matches aren't one big spot fests. How many of his matches have you actually seen? If you ever watched one you'd see a wrestler as techinical as Kurt Angle, and someone who can do amazing things in the ring. All Mic Foley can do is spot fests. Please tell me what else he can do seriously? Who remembers one match he's done where it hasnt been about him falling off something really high, or him getting hit in the head with a chair numerous times.

How you even try to argue that Mic Foley is more than an under average wrestler is beyond me.

You has such flair for the dramatic don't you. " look everyone *incert attention here*"

Maybe if you actually read any of my posts wthout this attitude you would see what I was trying to say in the first place. There is a lot more to being a wrestler then being technical in the ring. It is entertainment. You don't have to like Mick Foley, but to say he wasn't an entertaining wrestler or say just because he did it different, doesn't make him a bad wrestler. You have shown several times that you only haveONE deffiniton to what you base a good wrestler apon and that is technical ability.