Wrestler Of The Decade- Round 2: Cena vs Undertaker
This is a discussion on Wrestler Of The Decade- Round 2: Cena vs Undertaker within the Wrestling Games forums, part of the General Pro Wrestling : Classic & General category; To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 20 or greater. You currently have 0 ...
Welcome to Wrestling Clique Wrestling Forums
Hello and Welcome to WrestlingClique - Wrestling Forums!
We are the premier wrestling forum and your source for wrestling news and rumors, wrestling divas, wrestling gifs, sports discussion, e-feds, writing and more. Wrestling fans participate in active discussion on all the major wrestling leagues and events including WWE, ECW & TNA pay per view events, live wrestling streams, wrestling video games, collectibles, and other wrestling related products and services.
You're currently viewing our site as an unregistered guest which means you are limited to most discussions and features.
Take a few minutes to browse around, and if you like what you see, Register a free account to gain access to :
• Richer content, access forums that are not viewable by the public.
• Complete access to post topics, respond to polls, communicate privately (PM), take part contests, arcade, photo sharing, networking, groups.
• Create your personal profile and bio
• Meet and Chat Live with other members who share similar interests
Registration is simple and fast. Won't take you more than a minute and of course it's completely free.
So Join our Community today!
Re: Wrestler Of The Decade- Round 2: Cena vs Undertaker
Fucking nasty draw. I think Cena has the edge on consistantsy, I don't think he was ever as bad as Taker was in 2000-01. Then again I think Taker has been better the last couple of years. I don't think anyone would consider Batista to be as good as Michaels and Taker got a better match out of him than Cena did out of Michaels at Wrestlemania. I don't think Cena has ever been the sort to really carry guys the way Taker has.
It's tough, I'll vote later.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Re: Wrestler Of The Decade- Round 2: Cena vs Undertaker
A To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 20 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. come on. Did you have to do this? To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 20 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
I have loved Undertaker's recent stuff. Basically since he returned as the Deadman he has been pretty damn good, getting better and better since 2004. 2006-now has been awesome for him, and I believe that run alone is probably enough to top Cena. Taker was indeed pretty poor in general in 2000-2001, but started producing some good stuff in 2002.
Cena has been a very consistent wrestler since his big main event push really, and usually produces the goods on the big occasions. He gave Umaga, Khali and Lashley their best matches during his title reign, which may be the best reign in terms of match quality this decade, due to the classics against Umaga and HBK, and very good matches against Orton, Lashley, Edge etc.
Both men have produced a lot of standout matches over the years, and although inconsistent and even bad at the start of the decade, Undertaker has been very impressive over the last few years. I think that, despite how great both of these guys have been, Undertaker has to take this, because I can think of a lot more great Taker matches than I can great Cena matches. He's just been amazing in recent times. Even Cena can't compete with that.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Re: Wrestler Of The Decade- Round 2: Cena vs Undertaker
Not an easy choice, but I'm going with Cena based on consistency and excitement. While Taker's great and all (especially with the great matches he's had for the past few years), there's rarely anything knew storyline-wise for him.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Re: Wrestler Of The Decade- Round 2: Cena vs Undertaker
Vote goes to Taker
Taker is legendary from start to finish even with his lull in 2000 - 2001. Not many people have recovered from gimmick changes small or big.
Linear Mode
