This is a discussion on What side are you on? within the TNA Discussion forums, part of the Wrestling Forums category; Forget that TNA is using the veterans as heels and the younger generation as face, lets look at the arguments ...
Welcome to Wrestling Clique Wrestling Forums
Hello and Welcome to WrestlingClique - Wrestling Forums!
We are the premier wrestling forum and your source for wrestling news and rumors, wrestling divas, wrestling gifs, sports discussion, e-feds, writing and more. Wrestling fans participate in active discussion on all the major wrestling leagues and events including WWE, ECW & TNA pay per view events, live wrestling streams, wrestling video games, collectibles, and other wrestling related products and services.
You're currently viewing our site as an unregistered guest which means you are limited to most discussions and features.
Take a few minutes to browse around, and if you like what you see, Register a free account to gain access to :
• Richer content, access forums that are not viewable by the public.
• Complete access to post topics, respond to polls, communicate privately (PM), take part contests, arcade, photo sharing, networking, groups.
• Create your personal profile and bio
• Meet and Chat Live with other members who share similar interests
Registration is simple and fast. Won't take you more than a minute and of course it's completely free.
So Join our Community today!
Forget that TNA is using the veterans as heels and the younger generation as face, lets look at the arguments for each side:
Veterans:
- Want respect for what they have done in the wrestling business.
-Claim they and the legends before them made it possible for the Younger Generation to have a job in the wrestling business.
Younger Generation:
- Claim that they are showing the Veterans respect, but its a two way street. They are facing the same hardships that the Veterans used to face back in the day.
- The veterans are taking roster spots and money away from them, while only working part time.
- If it wasnt for the Younger Generation staying in TNA, getting the company off of weekly ppv's and onto Spike, the veterans would be out of work.
- It was the Younger Generation who helped establish TNA and they are the future of TNA.
Looking at the arguements presented by both sides, which side do you support?
Totally the Younger Generation. All their points make more sense. I mean the legends did really pave the way, but tbh, they are just taking up roster space. (i.e. Sting, Kevin Nash, etc.) <--- Even though I hate to say it. I love them both, but they are just getting really old now. I mean, I respect them all, but meh. I just don't understand why Kurt Angle and Booker T are considered "Legends". I mean I understand, but they aren't really "Veterans". Or they don't seem "old" in my eyes. >_>
__________________
THE LAST GSX WORLD CHAMP... EVER. REMEMBER THAT.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
CGS RECORD (2-0-0)
I WOULD HAVE BEEN 3-0-0 BUT CGS WENT UNDER.
I love both sides. Veterans have one of my favorites wrestlers of all time, as in Kurt Angle. The new generation is stacked though, as they have AJ and Joe. The Veterans side makes more sense, as all they were asking for was a little respect, but the youngsters wouldn't give them any. AJ paved the way for TNA, and Joe didn't even show up until 2005. Sting already appeared in TNA before Joe did lol.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Linear Mode
