This is a discussion on Are the women taking over? within the TNA Discussion forums, part of the Wrestling Forums category; If you look at the detailed rating you can clearly see that the ratings are at the highest when the ...
Welcome to Wrestling Clique Wrestling Forums
Hello and Welcome to WrestlingClique - Wrestling Forums!
We are the premier wrestling forum and your source for wrestling news and rumors, wrestling divas, wrestling gifs, sports discussion, e-feds, writing and more. Wrestling fans participate in active discussion on all the major wrestling leagues and events including WWE, ECW & TNA pay per view events, live wrestling streams, wrestling video games, collectibles, and other wrestling related products and services.
You're currently viewing our site as an unregistered guest which means you are limited to most discussions and features.
Take a few minutes to browse around, and if you like what you see, Register a free account to gain access to :
• Richer content, access forums that are not viewable by the public.
• Complete access to post topics, respond to polls, communicate privately (PM), take part contests, arcade, photo sharing, networking, groups.
• Create your personal profile and bio
• Meet and Chat Live with other members who share similar interests
Registration is simple and fast. Won't take you more than a minute and of course it's completely free.
So Join our Community today!
If you look at the detailed rating you can clearly see that the ratings are at the highest when the women are in action... IS this a bad omen for Impact and should TNA look more into the use of its female wrestlers?
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
i don't think so, i think TNA is doing just fine, sure they don't have ratings like wwe but the quality is much much better, there womens division however, in my opinion surpasses wwe's by far i think tna should just keep using them the way they are, maybe 1 or 2 matches a week since they have such a stacked roster
The KNOCKOUTS deserve 2 matches a week nuff said. To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 20 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
I think the reason the knockouts have done so well thus far and have the most intrigue along with them is due to them not tainting the competition with as much weapons/undecided victories. Kong was awesome because she won matches and won them clean. The worst of the woman's division is clearly the "Bimbo street Brawls" and last weeks beauty pageant. If TNA stays away from that and sticks to what made waves... they'll be in good shape with their woman's division
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Truth be told I can't stand TNA because of the woman's division. I can't be the only person here who thinks that women have no place in the ring. They are ok as a valet, but that is the jest of it. At least WWE is eye candy.
I think the reason the knockouts have done so well thus far and have the most intrigue along with them is due to them not tainting the competition with as much weapons/undecided victories. Kong was awesome because she won matches and won them clean. The worst of the woman's division is clearly the "Bimbo street Brawls" and last weeks beauty pageant. If TNA stays away from that and sticks to what made waves... they'll be in good shape with their woman's division
The Bimbo Brawls was originally for Moose but she broke her leg doing a show in front of seven people. Roxxi seems to be replacing her as the Rough Cut segements have been putting her over the most Hardcore Knockout on the roster.
The Beauty Pageant was the highest rated part of the show (Three segements averaged)
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Truth be told I can't stand TNA because of the woman's division. I can't be the only person here who thinks that women have no place in the ring. They are ok as a valet, but that is the jest of it. At least WWE is eye candy.
I completely disagree with this statement. TNA's Women's division is fantastic and with The Beautiful People and Taylor Wilde they have women that destroy the eye candy in WWE in both skill and beauty.
I used to hold the same opinion as you, but I realised (thanks to Gail Kim and Awesome Kong, see also; Sara Del Rey, Lacey, MsChif, etc...) that it's WWE's women's division that has no place in ring, not all women in general.
I think Awesome Kong winning cleanly as a heel and the largely "untainted" competition that TNA woman's division has explains a lot of why it is so succesful too. By untainted I mean there aren't a lot of gimmicks in comparison to the guys
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
If you look at the detailed rating you can clearly see that the ratings are at the highest when the women are in action... IS this a bad omen for Impact and should TNA look more into the use of its female wrestlers?
I actually find that TNA chicks>>>>>>WWE chicks. The TNA ladies actually wrestle. Look at Roxxi, for example. You'd probably never see a WWE female covered in blood. TNA ladies are more skilled. WWE ladies (most, not all) are more about being eye candy than having any talent.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Linear Mode
