TNA in Trouble/The Fans

Dasdream

I fear that TNA may be taken off of SpikeTv soon they average a 0.8 cable rating, which is bad considering that the WWE Diva Search finals drew more ratings! I don't see anything extremely wrong with TNA in my opinion it's the viewers ( or non viewers ) that need to get their heads straight and realize TNA is not a perfect company and here is why I say this:

"I don't watch TNA because of the way the ring is"

Oh my how dare TNA go against "tradition" Come on, so they only reason why you watch any show is for the ring? Instead of looking at the ring you should start looking at the people ON it.

"I don't watch TNA, because they have alot of old has beens"

Now, correct me if I'm wrong but Hogan, Flair, Mick Foley, Jim Duggans, Tatanka etc. aren't exactly "rookies" anymore now are they? If you can watch WWE who have OLDER stars then TNA, then you can watch TNA.

"I don't watch TNA, because they have all the WWE rejects"

I don't remember seeing Samoa Joe, Daniels, Sabin, Abyss, Petey Williams, AMW, Alpha Male, Sonjay Dutt etc. in WWE and if they were, who cares? AJ Styles was in WWE and used him as a toy to job to other guys, nice move by creative. You people complain when they go to TNA yet cheer your heads off when they return to WWE!

and here is the best one

"I don't watch TNA, because they have no wrestling, it's all an acrobatic show"

Right and WWE is? WWE is a late night drama. Apparently people like to miss the obvious. TNA means Total Non-stop Action. It's a new style, don't you get tired of seeing the same moves over and over again? TNA brings you something new every time. Don't you dare come and say you watch WWE after making that comment, that just makes you look hypocritical and very un-knowledgeable about what these "wrestling" companies are really about.

Point is, these are lame excuses not to watch TNA. Come up with something better, like I don't have cable or my dog ate the TV or my mom threw it out by mistake. Truth be told you don't watch TNA because you are a WWE mark and only care for WWE and won't watch anything but WWE, you live and breathe WWE, you sleep with WWE, you eat WWE, you swallow every piece of crap they show you, yet criticize other companies for NOT doing the samething. In the year I have been on the internet I have seen people complain over and over again nonstop about WWE, yet continue to watch WWE. The same people complain about TNA yet never watch it! if you can watch WWE with all the "Fantasy fest" on Smackdown and "Late Night Drama" on Raw, then you can watch acrobatic moves on TNA. No company is perfect and instead of trying to point out the faults in every new thing, try to find the good and if you don't find anything good then you are just being ignorant at this point. I am not saying to stop watching WWE, heck I still watch WWE, but don't let your memories and "feeling" of WWE get in the way of seeing new things.

Many people like to argue in that WWE is just an all around better show. Yea so having a guy drop his pants and have other males kiss his butt, is better? having 2 males run around telling other guys to "suck it" is better?

All wrestling forums or websites I go to have members arguing over which company is better. I like TNA and I like WWE, but both have their faults, neither company is better then the other , just richer. Both have washed up "stars" on their shows, both have young talent, both have a "wrestler" that also runs the company. TNA knows what to do with talent, but don't know what to do with their money. WWE knows what to do with their money, but not their talent. Both have some terrible commentators, both have way to much "drama", Both have good matches, both have bad matches, Both have DVD’s, TV shows and websites. Their is not much difference between the companies except money, WWE is richer, that’s all, everything people say is just their opinion, no one can prove that a company is better then the other, because the end product is the same. Their like two peas in a pot, except one pea happens to be bigger. So which is better? Neither, their both the same, just different “wrestlers� Sorry for the diplomatic answer, but it’s the most obvious. TNA is on Thursday Nights so you can watch TNA without missing your precious WWE shows, nothing bad will happen to you for watching TNA think Vince will haunt you for the rest of your life. Give TNA a good hard chance and I don't mean one show, no , watch for at least a month and this includes the PPV, then comeback and tell me you opinion.

Luke-E

were did you copy and paste that from?
but as good as TNA is, it boreds me so im not giving it a 'good hard chance', as you or who ever wrote this.

http://www.sportzworld.net/

BigDaveBatista

I just don't like TNA because There wrestlers are indeed shit compared to WWE's, I mean, no one holds a candle in that company to HHH, HBK, Taker etc. and TNA are way to stupid in who they hire, I mean, they see people like Aries good enough to hire, while he is a great wrestler, they don't even look at Punk, stupid idea? Your damn right.

PeaceSells

Super Moderator

You do realise Punk was with TNA don't you Dave? Just Punk was loyal to ROH over TNA at the time Feinstein was cutting TNA's ties with ROH. That was the basis of his leaving I believe anyway.

Now onto what you said about TNA's wrestlers being shit. I can only presume you meant to say in terms of entertainment no-one can hold a candle to Triple H, HBK and Undertaker etc because that way your statement would mean something to me. But for you saying that no-one in TNA can hold a candle to those guys in terms of wrestling ability is pure and utter bull in my opinion. I mean how can you call Daniels, Styles, Low-Ki, among others, poor or "shit" wrestlers?! And if you do want to go down the entertainer path, Jarrett and Cage (as two examples) for me are as talented as most of WWE's performers. Perhaps they just weren't or wouldn't be implemented correctly in WWE yet they have been in TNA.

Basically my thoughts on that post of yours...

Luke-E

i never said they were shit but they bored me, i mean come on one great match every month and the rest suck and then theres the promos that bore me to death.

http://www.sportzworld.net/

Suffy

cage's most recent promo was golden, they have about a good match every impact, and bout 5 good matches on the ppv, and jarrett and cage and sting and rhyno (hes come into his own) samoa joe, chris daniels, konnan, bg james are all great entertainers can work the mic very well

Dasdream

I copied it using my brain, I posted it almost everywhere.

"if you don't find anything good then you are just being ignorant at this point"

it is so funny that you people are the same that complain over WWE doing some boring segmants yet still watch WWE. This goes with what i said about 'wrestling" don't tell me you don't watch it because lack of "wrestling" because WWE is just as bad as TNA, same goes with the "entertainment" aspect of it.

Luke-E

tna has good wrestling but very poor mic work and it lets it down a lot and even when WWE does use the 'same boring segmants' the people on mic stop it from being TO boring unlike in TNA were ever god damn bit of mic work is.

http://www.sportzworld.net/

stevo91

i very much dont think spike will cause to tell you the truth spike is a idiot channel they put rasing the roof on prime time :sk: :oo:

YamiGoku999

TNA will be fine trust me.