Page 2 of 9 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 178

Thread: PWA SUPREMACY

  1. #21
    On Vacation
    King Knuckles's Avatar

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    353
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: PWA SUPREMACY

    Quote Originally Posted by Warlock View Post
    I tried to help. Either you or Blaze will have an issue either way. At least this way you walk out champ regardless? lol.
    No, Blaze is fine. He only has 1 male character in the match.

    The issue lies with my male and female characters, and in fact, switching Knucks and Morph would solve it, but rules are rules and it adds drama!

    Knucks scored higher than Morph so he has to be on Team Champs. There is some fuckery but I like it.

  2. #22
    Forever The Revival
    Matrix's Avatar

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    830
    Rep Power
    77538

    Re: PWA SUPREMACY

    Knucks you got 1 thing wrong, there has always been a rematch for former Prestige Champs after losing their belt. Does not matter if they lose it in a singles match or multi person match.
    [IMG]https://***************/57909_s.gif [/IMG]

  3. #23
    On Vacation
    King Knuckles's Avatar

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    353
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: PWA SUPREMACY

    Quote Originally Posted by Matrix View Post
    Knucks you got 1 thing wrong, there has always been a rematch for former Prestige Champs after losing their belt. Does not matter if they lose it in a singles match or multi person match.
    LMAO are you serious? I have not been doing this and no one said anything... I didn't even know.

    Prestige Champion can change every week. That's too many rematches. Let's talk about this.

    Edit: Maybe more triple threat matches is a good thing? And a fatal fourway if #1 Ranks are tied.
    Last edited by King Knuckles; 11-08-2018 at 06:36 PM.

  4. #24
    Squash Fodder

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    156
    Rep Power
    5016

    Re: PWA SUPREMACY

    I dont think that's right, but fine with the change. Will keep things rolling.

    Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

  5. #25
    Squash Fodder

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    156
    Rep Power
    5016

    Re: PWA SUPREMACY

    Quote Originally Posted by King Knuckles View Post
    No, Blaze is fine. He only has 1 male character in the match.

    The issue lies with my male and female characters, and in fact, switching Knucks and Morph would solve it, but rules are rules and it adds drama!

    Knucks scored higher than Morph so he has to be on Team Champs. There is some fuckery but I like it.
    Said blaze but think I meant biggrigg

    Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

  6. #26
    On Vacation
    King Knuckles's Avatar

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    353
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: PWA SUPREMACY

    Quote Originally Posted by Warlock View Post
    Said blaze but think I meant biggrigg

    Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
    BiggRigg's characters are both Challengers.


    So are we doing no rematch for former Prestige Champion?


    Edit: If we do rematch for title change, new champion has to defend in triple threat, which defeats the purpose of CA.
    Last edited by King Knuckles; 11-08-2018 at 07:20 PM.

  7. #27
    Forever The Revival
    Matrix's Avatar

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    830
    Rep Power
    77538

    Re: PWA SUPREMACY

    Quote Originally Posted by King Knuckles View Post
    LMAO are you serious? I have not been doing this and no one said anything... I didn't even know.

    Prestige Champion can change every week. That's too many rematches. Let's talk about this.

    Edit: Maybe more triple threat matches is a good thing? And a fatal fourway if #1 Ranks are tied.
    The Prestige is more the women's version of the IC than the Pure, it should have rematches no matter what. I never noticed you weren't doing it but that was always the rule. It was just set up where the same person couldn't challenge 2 weeks in a row as a way to keep things moving.
    [IMG]https://***************/57909_s.gif [/IMG]

  8. #28
    Squash Fodder

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    156
    Rep Power
    5016

    Re: PWA SUPREMACY

    It was built to be in the middle of the two.

    Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

  9. #29
    On Vacation
    King Knuckles's Avatar

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    353
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: PWA SUPREMACY

    Quote Originally Posted by Matrix View Post
    The Prestige is more the women's version of the IC than the Pure, it should have rematches no matter what. I never noticed you weren't doing it but that was always the rule. It was just set up where the same person couldn't challenge 2 weeks in a row as a way to keep things moving.
    But that means the new champion will always have to defend in a triple threat - which defeats the purpose of CA (and the fact that Prestige is more like the IC).

    That's why I suggest rematches ONLY for retaining via CA - the rematch will be a triple threat with no CA (makes sense).

    The Prestige is prestigious because of that 5%. Removing the 5% just makes it another PURE title.
    Last edited by King Knuckles; 11-08-2018 at 09:41 PM.

  10. #30
    On Vacation
    King Knuckles's Avatar

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    353
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: PWA SUPREMACY

    Quote Originally Posted by Warlock View Post
    It was built to be in the middle of the two.

    Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
    So rematch or no rematch?

    I personally like the idea of no rematch because too many rematches and triple threats don't feel special.

    Also for reasons I mentioned to Matrix.
    Last edited by King Knuckles; 11-08-2018 at 09:39 PM.

  11. #31
    Squash Fodder

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    156
    Rep Power
    5016

    Re: PWA SUPREMACY

    Based on what you are saying(new champ always having a first defense in a triple threat) I'm pretty sure we've never done rematch clause for losing champ with it.. at least not every champ.

    Like I'm almost certain we put a threshold on it(ie - successfully defend it x time to get a rematch when lost) but I'm on mobile till Tuesday and likely won't be able to look it up.

    Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

  12. #32
    Forever The Revival
    Matrix's Avatar

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    830
    Rep Power
    77538

    Re: PWA SUPREMACY

    Quote Originally Posted by King Knuckles View Post
    But that means the new champion will always have to defend in a triple threat - which defeats the purpose of CA (and the fact that Prestige is more like the IC).

    That's why I suggest rematches ONLY for retaining via CA - the rematch will be a triple threat with no CA (makes sense).

    The Prestige is prestigious because of that 5%. Removing the 5% just makes it another PURE title.
    When the former champ has a rematch it means for that week nobody new gets a shot. I don't wanna change the system at all on this either. 1 belt with no rematch is enough for me and constant triple threats would be ridiculous. We should keep it the way it is, former champ gets rematch in a singles match and always gets a rematch, but barring a loss by ca you cannot challenge for Prestige 2 weeks in a row.
    [IMG]https://***************/57909_s.gif [/IMG]

  13. #33
    I'm cool. I think
    The Gipper's Avatar

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    1,623
    Rep Power
    214213

    Re: PWA SUPREMACY

    You guys have a debate about the rules every week and it's very entertaining to me.
    " I have this weird self-esteem issue where I hate myself but still think I’m better than everyone else."

  14. #34
    On Vacation
    King Knuckles's Avatar

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    353
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: PWA SUPREMACY

    Quote Originally Posted by Matrix View Post
    When the former champ has a rematch it means for that week nobody new gets a shot. I don't wanna change the system at all on this either. 1 belt with no rematch is enough for me and constant triple threats would be ridiculous. We should keep it the way it is, former champ gets rematch in a singles match and always gets a rematch, but barring a loss by ca you cannot challenge for Prestige 2 weeks in a row.
    So what happens to the new contender? It's not fair to take their opportunity away.

    I understand you don't wanna change the system. But so far, it's your vote against Warlock and myself.

    Title shots are weekly. Rematches are just silly. The best players will have top ranks anyway.

  15. #35
    On Vacation
    King Knuckles's Avatar

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    353
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: PWA SUPREMACY

    Quote Originally Posted by The Gipper View Post
    You guys have a debate about the rules every week and it's very entertaining to me.
    This is a real debate - to make the game better - unlike last week with all the tantrums.

  16. #36
    On Vacation
    Psychosis's Avatar

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    690
    Rep Power
    0
      Country                    Aaland

    Re: PWA SUPREMACY

    Leakee u worthless little piece of ..... I've just agreed to terminate your career have a nice day , oh still haven't paid that 100K u wanna hurry before I send u down stairs to be Hopsky s playmate


    Oh it's on...

  17. #37
    On Vacation
    Psychosis's Avatar

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    690
    Rep Power
    0
      Country                    Aaland

    Re: PWA SUPREMACY

    Quote Originally Posted by The Gipper View Post
    You guys have a debate about the rules every week and it's very entertaining to me.

    Join up dude.

    Peace.

  18. #38
    Forever The Revival
    Matrix's Avatar

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    830
    Rep Power
    77538

    Re: PWA SUPREMACY

    Quote Originally Posted by King Knuckles View Post
    So what happens to the new contender? It's not fair to take their opportunity away.

    I understand you don't wanna change the system. But so far, it's your vote against Warlock and myself.

    Title shots are weekly. Rematches are just silly. The best players will have top ranks anyway.
    But this only came up because you messed up. And its easy enough to get back to the top of the Prestige Table that I don't see the big deal in someone missing out on their shot due to a rematch clause. I would rather do away with the prestige table all together than get rid of guarenteed rematches. Plus only getting a rematch when you lose a multi person match makes no sense.
    [IMG]https://***************/57909_s.gif [/IMG]

  19. #39
    I'm cool. I think
    The Gipper's Avatar

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    1,623
    Rep Power
    214213

    Re: PWA SUPREMACY

    Quote Originally Posted by Psychosis View Post
    Join up dude.

    Peace.
    I don't keep enough track of the current WWE product to compete in this tbh.
    " I have this weird self-esteem issue where I hate myself but still think I’m better than everyone else."

  20. #40
    On Vacation
    Psychosis's Avatar

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    690
    Rep Power
    0
      Country                    Aaland

    Re: PWA SUPREMACY

    Quote Originally Posted by The Gipper View Post
    I don't keep enough track of the current WWE product to compete in this tbh.
    Neither did I mate all but is Dave from raw pick 4/5 same as SDL or ok four from each n two from 205 mate, oh yes a lot harder than it looks . have a go u don't like don't join see ain't no harm in trying mate
    Peaçe

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •