View Poll Results: Who was the better heel?

Voters
10. You may not vote on this poll
  • The Undertaker

    3 30.00%
  • Paul Heyman

    7 70.00%
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Best Heel Ever Tournament: The Undertaker vs Paul Heyman

  1. #1
    WAKE UP

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    32,227
    Rep Power
    236317

    Best Heel Ever Tournament: The Undertaker vs Paul Heyman

    Despite being face for most of this decade Mean Mark has been heel for the majority of his career under different twists on his character. Heyman was a heel manager of the likes of the Freebirds during the late 80's and has also managed several heels in the WWE this decade.


    Mean Mark or Paul. E?

  2. #2

    Re: Best Heel Ever Tournament: The Undertaker vs Paul Heyman

    Heyman easily. Especially as the Dead Man, the fans wanted to cheer Taker. Heyman, on the other hand, could easily be booed where ever he was at.

  3. #3
    WAKE UP

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    32,227
    Rep Power
    236317

    Re: Best Heel Ever Tournament: The Undertaker vs Paul Heyman

    I dunno, Heyman got cheered alot during the Invasion angle.

    I'm leaning more towards Paul though, simply becuase of his stuff as a manager as Paul. E.

  4. #4
    King of New York

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Huntington, New York
    Posts
    4,116
    Rep Power
    19

    Re: Best Heel Ever Tournament: The Undertaker vs Paul Heyman

    What does it for me is that while Paul is a creative genius and was one of the more underated managers as "Paul-E" Undertaker since about 2004 was a Face the majority of the time and was on and off during the attitude Era while Heyman was a full blown heel and was able to get the crowd to boo him in a heart beat. Although the Undertaker was able to get me very very scared when I first started watching in 1991-92 when I was little.


    Click As Well

  5. #5
    Indy Talent

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    436
    Rep Power
    11

    Re: Best Heel Ever Tournament: The Undertaker vs Paul Heyman

    For me it's the undertaker taker. I can hate him, but not Paul. E.

    I hated taker in 02. And dis-liked his deadman gimmick when he wouldnt talk on the mic, or very rarely.

    But Paul.E he is the man. Just tells the truth and is so funny when he rants

  6. #6
    Stud Muffin
    DD's Avatar

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    31,117
    Rep Power
    14018
      Country                    United States

    Re: Best Heel Ever Tournament: The Undertaker vs Paul Heyman

    While Undertaker is one of my all time favorites, its for his babyface runs. Plus Heyman was an amazing heel.


  7. #7
    Johnny Cash Lis'nen

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Bradentucky, Florida
    Posts
    4,268
    Rep Power
    16368
      Country                    us=United States

    Re: Best Heel Ever Tournament: The Undertaker vs Paul Heyman

    Besides his obvious recognition as a great Heel commentator and great Heel manager in the WWE, it should also be noted his great Heel manager work in ECW and WCW. Taker never really was anything more than a bad ass tough guy as a Heel. Or a one dimensional dark character. Heyman.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •