Wrestling Forums : WWE, TNA, ECW, E-Fed, Wrestlemania, Live Wrestling Streams

Go Back   Wrestling Forums : WWE, TNA, ECW, E-Fed, Wrestlemania, Live Wrestling Streams » Sports Forums » North American Sports

North American Sports NFL, NBA, NHL, MLB, Golf. All the latest sports news, scores, rumors, fantasy games, and more.


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-11-2005, 11:34 AM   #71 (permalink)
pp2
Asthmatic Virtual Ninja
pp2's Avatar
 
Yeah, you suck. lol



(kidding of course, that was great recollection!)

pp2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2005, 01:46 PM   #72 (permalink)
Formerly "Tom Dogg"
Dr. Giganto's Avatar
 
Platinum Member
You know, I think Lou Piniella is on to something with this "Devil Rays management isnt trying to win" thing

After all, they just cut Alex Sanchez, I guess because he's only batting .346!!!

What the fuck is wrong with them???
Dr. Giganto is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2005, 01:47 PM   #73 (permalink)
Founder/Admin
Death Magnetic
Danny Diamond's Avatar
 
Awards Showcase
Best Avatars WC Hall of Famer 
Total Awards: 2
Pinella will be the next NYY manager.

It's about time......now bring on his next fued....


Danny Diamond is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2005, 01:53 PM   #74 (permalink)
pp2
Asthmatic Virtual Ninja
pp2's Avatar
 
Yeah he will be.

And MLB needs to fold that POS TB franchise stat. Same with Florida, Washington, and Arizona. Then we work on losing Toronto and Minnesota. Realign the leagues and divisions so they make sense, get rid of interleague play since the rivalries it created are now division rivalries.

I should be commissioner. I would so kick that sport in the hinder.

pp2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2005, 01:56 PM   #75 (permalink)
Formerly "Tom Dogg"
Dr. Giganto's Avatar
 
Platinum Member
You know the D-Rays have like a 30-year lease for their piece of shit stadium? That franchise is such a mess, it's ridiculous
Dr. Giganto is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2005, 02:06 PM   #76 (permalink)
pp2
Asthmatic Virtual Ninja
pp2's Avatar
 
Whoever had the idea to expand into Florida (or Arizona...or Canada) should be beaten. What's really frightening is that the White Sox were going to move out to TB in the late 80s until they got their stadium deal at the 11th hour. There's so little market out there for pro sports. Good football support, but that's 8 times a year. The other sports have attendance problems fairly regulary there.

I'm all for contraction to protect the integrity of the game.

pp2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2005, 05:57 PM   #77 (permalink)
Set Trippin'
Blitzkrieg's Avatar
 
Platinum Member
Awards Showcase
Non Wrestling Member of the Month 
Total Awards: 1
I'm for contraction too but I would hate to see some teams with history wiped away...


D-Rays...who cares? But with the rest of the teams (And I thought Washington was doing well?) I would keep around until after some sort of salary cap is implemented into the sport. If fans still don't come to the ballparks then fine, cut them.
Blitzkrieg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2005, 10:43 AM   #78 (permalink)
Formerly "Tom Dogg"
Dr. Giganto's Avatar
 
Platinum Member
I found myself watching the final round of the US Open yesterday...first time I've watched at length since the furst time Tiger won the Masters

If Tiger hadnt missed two short putts on 16 and 17, he would've gone to a playoff...
Dr. Giganto is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2005, 01:14 PM   #79 (permalink)
pp2
Asthmatic Virtual Ninja
pp2's Avatar
 
Top 10 career RBI leaders:

1) Hank Aaron
2,297

2) Babe Ruth
2,213

3) Lou Gehrig
1,995

4) Stan Musial
1,951

5) Ty Cobb
1,937

6) Jimmie Foxx
1,922

7) Eddie Murray
1,917

8) Willie Mays
1,903

9) Cap Anson
1,880

10) Mel Ott
1,860

Did you know...that back in the day, around when guys like Ruth, Cobb, Anson, and I think Foxx played that RBIs in walkoff situations above what you needed to win weren't counted?

Example...Ruth comes up with bases loaded in the bottom of the 9th (or bottom of an extra inning) in a 2-2 game. He jacks a slam, but he gets only 1 RBI credited to him instead of 4 like he would today and the final score would be 3-2 instead of 6-2. Makes you wonder how many RBIs some of these guys really had. I forget when this rule was changed, I'm thinking in the 50s or 60s. Definitely post-war though.

pp2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2005, 04:30 PM   #80 (permalink)
Formerly "Tom Dogg"
Dr. Giganto's Avatar
 
Platinum Member
oh wow, i didnt know about that rule...I dont think it made THAT much of a difference though.

Look at it this way, Babe Ruth had 714 Home runs. Now, let's just say, for simplicity's sake, that he hit exactly half of his homeruns on the road. Since it's impossible to hit a walk-off on the road, that would mean he would have had at most 357 walk-off homeruns.

Now, lets just assume he hit an equal number of homeruns in each inning of the game, and we'll also count all extra-inning games as one "inning". Since a walk-off can only come in the ninth inning or later, that means that at most, one-fifth of those home-runs could have possibly been walk-offs. That leaves us with 70 homeruns, at home, in the ninth inning or later.

Assuming that Babe Ruth's teams for his career, won 4 out of every 7 games (that would be an average record of 88-76, which is reasonable) that would mean that roughly 40 of Ruth's 714 homeruns came in the ninth-inning or later in home games.

Now you can break those homeruns down even further. He could have hit a home-run that was not a walk-off, hit a home-run to put the Yankees up by one, two, three, or 4 runs. Assuming those 4 instances have an equal probability of happening, that means that Ruth would have had roughly 32 walk-off homeruns for his career (a fairly high number, even for Babe Ruth).

If 8 of those put the Yankees up by one run, that would mean that Ruth hit 24 walk-off homeruns where he was deprived of RBIs. 8 of them would have deprived him of 1 RBI, 8 would have deprived him of 2 RBIs, and 8 would have deprived him of 3 RBIs. Meaning that the rule would have cost Ruth roughly 48 RBIs for his career. It could have been more, it could have been less (I would guess it was less), but it almost certainly was less than 50 RBIs that it cost Ruth for his career
Dr. Giganto is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Your Ad Here

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Random Wrestling Thoughts Mr. Kennedy WWE Discussion 260 05-25-2007 09:42 PM
Anyone have random thoughts on.... paulsevere WWE Discussion 3 10-25-2006 11:04 PM
Random Thoughts Snowman General Discussion 48 08-14-2006 01:14 AM
Miakal + Random Thoughts Miakal WWE Discussion 22 11-10-2005 05:18 AM