This is a discussion on College Football 2009 Discussion within the North American Sports forums, part of the Sports Forums category; Bye bye Charlie.
Two Losses to Navy in 3 years = Unacceptable...
Welcome to Wrestling Clique Wrestling Forums
Hello and Welcome to WrestlingClique - Wrestling Forums!
We are the premier wrestling forum and your source for wrestling news and rumors, wrestling divas, wrestling gifs, sports discussion, e-feds, writing and more. Wrestling fans participate in active discussion on all the major wrestling leagues and events including WWE, ECW & TNA pay per view events, live wrestling streams, wrestling video games, collectibles, and other wrestling related products and services.
You're currently viewing our site as an unregistered guest which means you are limited to most discussions and features.
Take a few minutes to browse around, and if you like what you see, Register a free account to gain access to :
• Richer content, access forums that are not viewable by the public.
• Complete access to post topics, respond to polls, communicate privately (PM), take part contests, arcade, photo sharing, networking, groups.
• Create your personal profile and bio
• Meet and Chat Live with other members who share similar interests
Registration is simple and fast. Won't take you more than a minute and of course it's completely free.
So Join our Community today!
The fact that they are 6-4 makes them a below average team. They beat a bunch of thrown together teams and now they're decent? Please stop the foolishness, all im saying is you had a chance a couple of weeks ago to not even mention Iowa as a top team yet you did because you loved the THOUGHT of them actually being taken serious. I swear you didn't believe anything you were saying because how Iowa could even be thought of as a serious team makes me lol. Their style of play is not going to get them to the top. Had it not been for Indiana LOSING that game to Iowa they'd have to L'S on the record. Cut out the bullshit and pick a new team to root for.
Wow, you seem to have summized things that were never said into one well-thought out garbage post. I congratulate you on misconstruing words. Let's start at the top shall we?
Northwestern isn't a decent team because of their record and once again you show you know nothing by using record as an overall gauge of ability. This is fun, the fact that my 8 year old niece understands this concept better than you do baffles me. How do you not mention Iowa as a top team? I mean they won all their games, and based on record, that should be good enough right? Oh, but now we're determining their status based on who and how they play, so when it's convenient, you use whichever method suits your argument, gotcha. I agree, teams that win should NEVER be taken seriously. Only teams that are awarded 'style' points by winning with ZOMGBAKUPQBS should be taken seriously. Also, I'd hardly call scoring 4 touchdowns in the fourth quarter an aberration completely caused by Indiana. Was the collapse on Indiana's part? Sure, but apparently Iowa gets no credit for rising to the occasion. You make total sense here. Anyway, I really enjoy arguing with you, but sadly the fact that you refuse to believe anyone but yourself pretty much proves to me that you're just another mindless drone whom only wants what he wishes.
(Oh, and I root for Wisconsin/Minnesota, I don't jump one wagon to another because one of my 'teams' starts losing *cough*Oklahoma*cough*) Loyalty seems to something you know nothing of.
Iowa may have been overrated (which everyone knew not just 'you') but how does that make Cincy's case stronger? They should still be behind at least Bama, Florida, and Texas at this point.. and I'd even argue Boise and TCU over Cincy.
Overrated? They should be penalized for not winning against a tougher schedule with less style or what? I admit I don't think they were going to maintain their top team status, and I do believe they'd get plastered by USC/Oregon, but at the time, they were most definitely deserving of their ranking.
I can see TCU being above UC but Boise? Hell no, and see thats the thing you guys were thinking I was saying UC should be numero uno when I'VE NEVER SAID THAT all I been saying is Iowa is overrated and I been getting shit for that. Hell in one of my previous posts I had UC @ #4 behind TCU.
You did say Cincy vs Texas should be the championship game, so if you didn't say #1, you said #2, which is close enough to #1. Either way, I'm sure you 'weren't serious'
Boise beat Oregon, who to this point, has been mauling the Pac-10 including USC, who suffered their worst loss to them in the Carrol era just last week.. Now, Oregon is losing to Stanford so far this week, so who knows.. but the point is, you have to look at the body of work and unfortunately for Cincy, they have not played a single opponent that I believe is worth mentioning on a national stage. I don't dislike them.. I just dislike how you've carried on as if they are owed something.
Look.. if Cincy stays unbeaten and they maul through Pitt and West Virginia and a few more teams suffer a loss or so.. who knows where the chips may land. But please, stuff your "cincy is being screwed" stories in a sack.
Edit: Btw, I believe Iowa's ranking to this point was warranted because they won the games even if some of those games were ugly as sin. However, I'd drop them considerably after this week.
I have not been trying to make a case for UC being screwed what i've been saying is it was absolutely ridiculous that Iowa jumped them. Thats all I was/have been saying. It's not like I was saying "ohhh UC has played such a tough schedule they should be #1" I realize their schedule is a weak one, I'd agree 100% if TCU jumped UC THIS WEEK. Now if UC beat Pitt then UC should jump TCU, but what i've been saying is Iowa looked no more impressive than UC has.
........................................ I'm curious if you've even read your posts if that's what you believe. Or for that matter, anyone elses, using unbiased computer rankings it showed Iowa played a much tougher schedule than Cincy, but you were all bleeding from the ass because honestly I think you just hate the Big Ten. Whatever possesses you to be the incomprehensible moron you're turning into, I'd like for you to try and rid yourself of it.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
wait are you saying Magic Johnson is black, has AIDS and has it better than ME?
Wow, you seem to have summized things that were never said into one well-thought out garbage post. I congratulate you on misconstruing words. Let's start at the top shall we?
Northwestern isn't a decent team because of their record and once again you show you know nothing by using record as an overall gauge of ability. This is fun, the fact that my 8 year old niece understands this concept better than you do baffles me. How do you not mention Iowa as a top team? I mean they won all their games, and based on record, that should be good enough right? Oh, but now we're determining their status based on who and how they play, so when it's convenient, you use whichever method suits your argument, gotcha. I agree, teams that win should NEVER be taken seriously. Only teams that are awarded 'style' points by winning with ZOMGBAKUPQBS should be taken seriously. Also, I'd hardly call scoring 4 touchdowns in the fourth quarter an aberration completely caused by Indiana. Was the collapse on Indiana's part? Sure, but apparently Iowa gets no credit for rising to the occasion. You make total sense here. Anyway, I really enjoy arguing with you, but sadly the fact that you refuse to believe anyone but yourself pretty much proves to me that you're just another mindless drone whom only wants what he wishes.
(Oh, and I root for Wisconsin/Minnesota, I don't jump one wagon to another because one of my 'teams' starts losing *cough*Oklahoma*cough*) Loyalty seems to something you know nothing of.
Overrated? They should be penalized for not winning against a tougher schedule with less style or what? I admit I don't think they were going to maintain their top team status, and I do believe they'd get plastered by USC/Oregon, but at the time, they were most definitely deserving of their ranking.
You did say Cincy vs Texas should be the championship game, so if you didn't say #1, you said #2, which is close enough to #1. Either way, I'm sure you 'weren't serious'
Ditto, probably down to 14-15
........................................ I'm curious if you've even read your posts if that's what you believe. Or for that matter, anyone elses, using unbiased computer rankings it showed Iowa played a much tougher schedule than Cincy, but you were all bleeding from the ass because honestly I think you just hate the Big Ten. Whatever possesses you to be the incomprehensible moron you're turning into, I'd like for you to try and rid yourself of it.
Lmfao @ you.
The fact that you even brought SOS into the conversation when talking about IOWA'S is just LOL worthy. I could have sworn a couple posts ago you said you no longer needed to respond to me so....don't. I said the Texas UC thing weeks ago my friend good try though. To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 20 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
The fact that you even brought SOS into the conversation when talking about IOWA'S is just LOL worthy. I could have sworn a couple posts ago you said you no longer needed to respond to me so....don't. I said the Texas UC thing weeks ago my friend good try though. To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 20 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Oh, I'm sorry, I forgot about your blatant disregard for facts. I'll try to use illogical reason like you next time we argue.
And as much as I'd like to quit, every now and then I get my hopes up you won't be a complete fucking retard. Sadly I continue to leave this thread disappointed.
Also, week ago or not, I do believe you still said it To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 20 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
wait are you saying Magic Johnson is black, has AIDS and has it better than ME?
Oh, I'm sorry, I forgot about your blatant disregard for facts. I'll try to use illogical reason like you next time we argue.
And as much as I'd like to quit, every now and then I get my hopes up you won't be a complete fucking retard. Sadly I continue to leave this thread disappointed.
Also, week ago or not, I do believe you still said it To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 20 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
I do believe that was when UC came off a win and FL struggled. I said the BCS should be based on how teams performed that week and not about the politics.
I have nothing else to say because obviously your just a biased ass retard. I hate even stooping to your level but if that's what it takes then i guess that's what i'll do.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Linear Mode
