The WWE vs TNA Thread

Tommy Platinum · 11-15-2008, 09:19 PM

I am suprised we don't have one of these already. A few months ago on WS most people seemed to agree that WWE was a vastly superior product to TNA. However, in recent weeks I believe TNA has improved a huge amount, while WWE has gone backwards in recent months and their booking is really starting to annoy a lot of people, understandably so.

This thread is basically for everyone to chime in with their opinions on who has the superior product in mainstream wrestling and why. Which one do you enjoy the most? How are they different? What are the strengths and weaknesses of each company etc.

With TNA pretty good right now, this is an interesting question at this point in time and will hopefully spark some interesting debate, which I will get involved in when a few people have expressed their opinion.

John · 11-27-2008, 11:40 AM

TNA's Main Event Mafia is easily one of the best things TNA has ever produced.

Kurt Angle is a great leader and Sting can back up the group.

I've noticed more TNA fans than WWE fans on another forum i post on and there are more TNA Fans produced everyday. TNA will soon be better than WWE, You'll see! You'll All See!

King Steventon · 11-27-2008, 12:38 PM

TNA are the opitomy of terrible. A horrible mix of mind-blowingly bad booking and mediocre matches.

One of the worst companies around today.

Tommy Platinum · 11-27-2008, 01:41 PM

I think both are pretty bad right now. I think TNA is actually more interesting to watch, mainly due to the Main Event Mafia angle which is taking over the whole show. WWE still make terrible, terrible decisions and seem even less willing to take risks and push new talent, so I would currently go for TNA. I just hope WWE starts to become better with the likes of Orton, Cena, Edge, Helms, Kennedy, Umaga, Melina either back or coming back soon.

Purple Haze · 11-28-2008, 05:50 AM

What many people seem to forget is WWE has 5 hours of weekly wrestling to TNA's 2. So even if half of a show is boring, all-up, WWE is putting out more quality shows each week than TNA.

WWE consistenly puts on better matches, promos, angles, feuds, you name it, while TNA struggles with fundamentals. People are suddenly all over TNA because they made their first decent move in a long time with the MEM, but just remember one thing, it's not hard to stand out in a sea of mediocrity. Just because it's the first decent thing they've done in ages doesn't suddenly make them superior.

Tommy Platinum · 12-09-2008, 05:03 PM

A key point I have been reminded of recently is how much more 'adult' TNA is. Watching WWE is embarassing at times. It really does feel like watching a kids show.

King Steventon · 12-09-2008, 05:08 PM

That's more of a negative for wwe than a positive for TNA though.

Can anyone name me one positive thing from the last TNA PPV? Because it seems like 100% crap.

Tommy Platinum · 12-09-2008, 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lord Steventon
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 20 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

That's more of a negative for wwe than a positive for TNA though.

Can anyone name me one positive thing from the last TNA PPV? Because it seems like 100% crap.

Its a positive for TNA that they don't aim their product at kids imo.

A positive? Errr

...

...

Suicide was pretty cool.

King Steventon · 12-09-2008, 05:22 PM

Was he fuck. I lol'd at the music.

And it's not a positive for them if everyone else is doing it, just a negative for the wwe.

Tommy Platinum · 12-09-2008, 05:27 PM

lol the music was fucking hilarious. I still think Suicide is cool though.

I'm sure there were other positives from that PPV, I just can't think of them right now. >_>

Oh the MCMGs being dicks was pretty funny.

The WWE vs TNA Thread

This is a discussion on The WWE vs TNA Thread within the General Pro Wrestling : Classic & General forums, part of the Wrestling Forums category; I am suprised we don't have one of these already. A few months ago on WS most people seemed to ...