General Pro Wrestling : Classic & GeneralThis is a forum for anything wrestling related not directly associated with the WWE or TNA. Also WWE & TNA combined threads can go here as well. Also check out some Old school federations WWF, wCw, ECW and old NWA, wrestlers, matches, feuds, and more.
Welcome to Wrestling Clique Wrestling Forums
Hello and Welcome to WrestlingClique - Wrestling Forums!
We are the premier wrestling forum and your source for wrestling news and rumors, wrestling divas, wrestling gifs, sports discussion, e-feds, writing and more. Wrestling fans participate in active discussion on all the major wrestling leagues and events including WWE, ECW & TNA pay per view events, live wrestling streams, wrestling video games, collectibles, and other wrestling related products and services.
You're currently viewing our site as an unregistered guest which means you are limited to most discussions and features.
Take a few minutes to browse around, and if you like what you see, Register a free account to gain access to :
• Richer content, access forums that are not viewable by the public.
• Complete access to post topics, respond to polls, communicate privately (PM), take part contests, arcade, photo sharing, networking, groups.
• Create your personal profile and bio
• Meet and Chat Live with other members who share similar interests
Registration is simple and fast. Won't take you more than a minute and of course it's completely free.
So Join our Community today!
Visit 21onlinecasinos.com for the most top rated online casinos and play the greatest casino games for real money or for free!
...and had remained at the same level he was before the quad tear up until now, would he be considered one of the best ever?
So lets assume he remained fairly injury free and put on a comparable number of quality matches to back then.
I ask this because a lot of people talk about how awesome he was pre-quad tear, particularly in 2000-2001 when he became a main eventer and the top heel in WWE. He had a lot of very good matches in a short space of time, such as:
Royal Rumble 2000 - Triple H vs Cactus Jack (Street Fight)
No Way Out 2000 - Triple H vs Cactus Jack (Hell in a Cell)
Backlash 2000 - Triple H vs The Rock
Judgment Day 2000 - Triple H vs The Rock (Ironman match)
Fully Loaded 2000 - Triple H vs Chris Jericho (Last Man Standing)
Summerslam 2000 - Triple H vs The Rock vs Kurt Angle
No Mercy 2000 - Triple H vs Chris Benoit
Royal Rumble 2001 - Triple H vs Kurt Angle
No Way Out 2001- Triple H vs Steve Austin (3 stages of hell)
Wrestlemania X-7 - Triple H vs The Undertaker
RAW 2001 - Triple H/Steve Austin vs Chris Jericho/Chris Benoit
I have seen people on other forums call Triple H one of the best of all time, which for me is laughable, but IF he had managed to retain the quality he had in this time for a longer period, do you think Triple H could stake a claim to being one of the best we have seen, or was he never in the top bracket even in his prime?
"A few weeks prior to signing with WCW, I witnessed Hogan wrestle Flair on Nitro. Now strictly from a fan perspective, it was very hard to watch. What I witnessed that night was two legends that were shells of their former selves still trying to do it. Watching Hogan & Flair that night just wasn't right. In my opinion the bookers were just exploiting them to try to pop a number. It was a desperate situation and that's exactly the way it came across on TV."
- Vince Russo, Rope Opera
Tom says:
Are you saying you would watch Punk fuck a bald chick in a porno?
Ken says:
I'm saying I'd watch Punk alone in a porno.
Advertisement
Go Platinum, help support WrestlingClique and get rid of these ads!
Why is it laughable to you? There is no doubt in my mind that he IS one of the best ever. He's not THE best, but he is at least in the top 15. So the real question is would he be considered even greater.
Help out a struggling college student. Visit and shop for video games at my Amazon-based store, also get Blu-ray Discs: http://astore.amazon.com/spyke-20
You can also help me out by gifting me Virtual Conole/WiiWare games or sharing PSN games with me (PM me for my info)
Why is it laughable to you? There is no doubt in my mind that he IS one of the best ever. He's not THE best, but he is at least in the top 15. So the real question is would he be considered even greater.
He's not had anywhere enough good matches to be one of the best ever, and his best matches arn't comparable to the best matches of the true greats. A better question would be, why ISN'T it laughable to you?
I honestly think some people just believe everything the WWE tell them. Just because somebody has main evented for a decade and won 14 (?) World Titles doesn't mean they're actually a truly great wrestler. Since 2001 really he's been for the most part fairly average.
-----
One thing that counts against him, returning to my original question, is that the matches I listed are all against GREAT opponents, and often in gimmick matches. He faced two of the best brawlers of all time in their kind of match, and faced guys like Benoit and Angle in more technical matches. Basically, he always seemed to be facing the perfect guy for what they were trying to achieve. The Rock and Jericho also fit into this.
I'm not saying Triple H didn't pull his weight. If I was, I wouldn't have made this topic, but looking at the list, it takes away from his achievements that he was facing such good opponents. The very best are able to make bad wrestlers look good, and Trips has never really done that.
"A few weeks prior to signing with WCW, I witnessed Hogan wrestle Flair on Nitro. Now strictly from a fan perspective, it was very hard to watch. What I witnessed that night was two legends that were shells of their former selves still trying to do it. Watching Hogan & Flair that night just wasn't right. In my opinion the bookers were just exploiting them to try to pop a number. It was a desperate situation and that's exactly the way it came across on TV."
- Vince Russo, Rope Opera
Tom says:
Are you saying you would watch Punk fuck a bald chick in a porno?
Ken says:
I'm saying I'd watch Punk alone in a porno.
...and had remained at the same level he was before the quad tear up until now, would he be considered one of the best ever?
So lets assume he remained fairly injury free and put on a comparable number of quality matches to back then.
I ask this because a lot of people talk about how awesome he was pre-quad tear, particularly in 2000-2001 when he became a main eventer and the top heel in WWE. He had a lot of very good matches in a short space of time, such as:
Royal Rumble 2000 - Triple H vs Cactus Jack (Street Fight)
No Way Out 2000 - Triple H vs Cactus Jack (Hell in a Cell)
Backlash 2000 - Triple H vs The Rock
Judgment Day 2000 - Triple H vs The Rock (Ironman match)
Fully Loaded 2000 - Triple H vs Chris Jericho (Last Man Standing)
Summerslam 2000 - Triple H vs The Rock vs Kurt Angle
No Mercy 2000 - Triple H vs Chris Benoit
Royal Rumble 2001 - Triple H vs Kurt Angle
No Way Out 2001- Triple H vs Steve Austin (3 stages of hell)
Wrestlemania X-7 - Triple H vs The Undertaker
RAW 2001 - Triple H/Steve Austin vs Chris Jericho/Chris Benoit
I have seen people on other forums call Triple H one of the best of all time, which for me is laughable, but IF he had managed to retain the quality he had in this time for a longer period, do you think Triple H could stake a claim to being one of the best we have seen, or was he never in the top bracket even in his prime?
That's a good question.
I personally don't think he's one of the best ever either. His quality of matches started to dwindle in my eyes after WM 17. To me he looked lost in those matches against Jeff Hardy, and Hardy was actually looking better than Trips in those matches. In fact Triple H never did look too good against high flyers--Hardy's, Jericho (99-00). He looked his best against the ground guys, Rock, Austin, Benoit, Angle, 'Taker, Foley.
If Triple H couldn't solve the riddle of the high flyers, he'd wouldn't be too different than what he is right now. Just that fans wouldn't have had the chance to miss him as much as they did.
I think that where Triple H doesn't compare to others is in getting the best out of lesser wrestlers and also making guys look good in defeat. If you look at the list I posted, he made Jericho look great in defeat, and hasn't done that much, if at all since. However, even pre-quad tear, he never really had good matches with wrestlers who wern't great themselves. The list of talent he has worked with is staggering, and as much as Triple H was good in the matches, working with that calibre of wrestler is bound to help a LOT.
Most wrestlers don't have the luxury of wrestling such names as Foley, Austin, Jericho, Angle, Benoit, The Rock, The Undertaker, Cena etc, most of whom were in their primes, over the course of a career.
"A few weeks prior to signing with WCW, I witnessed Hogan wrestle Flair on Nitro. Now strictly from a fan perspective, it was very hard to watch. What I witnessed that night was two legends that were shells of their former selves still trying to do it. Watching Hogan & Flair that night just wasn't right. In my opinion the bookers were just exploiting them to try to pop a number. It was a desperate situation and that's exactly the way it came across on TV."
- Vince Russo, Rope Opera
Tom says:
Are you saying you would watch Punk fuck a bald chick in a porno?
Ken says:
I'm saying I'd watch Punk alone in a porno.
This is a really good question, man. I will come out right now and say that I am not an HHH fan in the least. The only thing that can even attest to his alleged greatness is the number of title reigns that he has had, and I would argue that he'll probably be one of the primary reasons why, in the future, title reigns won't be considered a criterion in deciding whether or not someone is a professional wrestling icon.
Undoubtedly, HHH had a great run from 1999-2001; he was the best heel in the business at this time. But, had he not left, he would not have had the momentum from re-debuting that allowed him to take his fixed place in WWE's main-event scene. Of course, you could argue that his relationship with Stephanie McMahon accounts for his rise to the top after his quad injury, but I refuse to go there. In the end, I honestly don't know what would have happened to HHH had he not had the quad tear. But, I think it was definitely a boon to his career.
More than anything, I wonder how the business would of changed had Hunter not gotten hurt. Hunter was originally penciled in to being the main attraction for the WCW brand under WWE control. Once he got hurt and WWE had objections from TNN, they gave up on running WCW as their own brand. Looking back at that time period, I can see Chris Jericho not receiving the big push he got. In the long run, it would probably have been better for him since his sudden depush ruined him for years in my eyes.
Without turning this into a Triple H hate post, he was never the same after his first knee surgery. Outside of his Summerslam match, I can't recall a good 2002 singles PPV match from him. Infact, the same could be said for Wrestlemania 19 in 2003. While he did improve in 2004 (Mostly because of Chris Benoit), he never reached the quality he set in 2000. To give out a rare compliment, it's pretty difficult to be that good again.
Since when are matches the only basis for whether someone was great or not? I'm not trying to pick on you or anything but Triple H has always been considered pretty damn good on the mic as well.. as a heel, not so much his face stuff..
Anyway, if we're only talking about matches, I have to agree that he's never been the same really since the first injury but he was great back then and he would go on to have many memorable matches after that... just not as good. Horrorfan_1986 brought up 2002, I think you have to give Triple H a lot of credit for what he did in the elimination chamber match as well.. RVD damn near killed him early in the match.. and he kept trucking along and went the distance with Shawn. I think that's an amazing performance by him.. they continued to go through their spots and everything. It's not a story most people talk about these days, but it shows how much he loves wrestling, performing, and putting on a good show.
I could name some other match post-2002 that have been fairly decent as well.. many people regard the triple threat with him, Benoit, and HBK at WM as one of the better Mania matches of all time and their rematch for Backlash wasn't bad either. Triple H also had a cage match with Flair that I thought was good, another match on RAW with Flair, and then him and Flair had a decent Last Man Standing match. None of it is MOTY stuff or anything but to sell him short on those would be a mistake.
I also disagree with the notion that he doesn't make people look good in defeat. He made Taka look brilliant.. he made Maven look like a million bucks on an episode of HEAT, there's others..
Since when are matches the only basis for whether someone was great or not? I'm not trying to pick on you or anything but Triple H has always been considered pretty damn good on the mic as well.. as a heel, not so much his face stuff..
Hunter is great at spur of the moment thinking for what to say. As much as I hated him at the time, when the production crew showed a wrong clip (During the Big Show feud in 2006), Hunter winged it and made it into a joke. However, his long drawn out interviews tends to always bore me. I will credit him for 2006's DX. While Michaels was painful to listen to at time, Hunter was funny at times. The DX impersonation of The McMahon's is a good example of that.
Anyway, if we're only talking about matches, I have to agree that he's never been the same really since the first injury but he was great back then and he would go on to have many memorable matches after that... just not as good. Horrorfan_1986 brought up 2002, I think you have to give Triple H a lot of credit for what he did in the elimination chamber match as well.. RVD damn near killed him early in the match.. and he kept trucking along and went the distance with Shawn. I think that's an amazing performance by him.. they continued to go through their spots and everything.
When I think of the Elimination Chamber, I really only think of Rob Van Dam. I give Hunter credit for staying in the match, but I would say that RVD, Jericho and of course Michaels were bigger stars than Hunter in the match.
You're right. Triple H is funny when he's just being himself.. but when it's scripted, it's awful. He probably doesn't write the stuff, but still..
I used to love his drawn out heel promo work in 2000. Him and Steph were great together. His shit in Evolution was good too but I got the feeling like sometimes they'd just throw him out there to waste 15 minutes because they didn't know what else to do.
We are the premier wrestling forum and your source for wrestling news and rumors, wrestling divas, wrestling gifs, sports discussion, e-feds, writing and more. Wrestling fans participate in active discussion on all the major wrestling leagues and events including WWE, ECW & TNA pay per view events, live wrestling streams, wrestling video games, collectibles, and other wrestling related products and services. read more...