This is a discussion on Could Any New Rules Be Added? within the General Pro Wrestling : Classic & General forums, part of the Wrestling Forums category; It's only natural that I can't think of any myself. But threads like this usually throw up some amusing answers.
...
Welcome to Wrestling Clique Wrestling Forums
Hello and Welcome to WrestlingClique - Wrestling Forums!
We are the premier wrestling forum and your source for wrestling news and rumors, wrestling divas, wrestling gifs, sports discussion, e-feds, writing and more. Wrestling fans participate in active discussion on all the major wrestling leagues and events including WWE, ECW & TNA pay per view events, live wrestling streams, wrestling video games, collectibles, and other wrestling related products and services.
You're currently viewing our site as an unregistered guest which means you are limited to most discussions and features.
Take a few minutes to browse around, and if you like what you see, Register a free account to gain access to :
• Richer content, access forums that are not viewable by the public.
• Complete access to post topics, respond to polls, communicate privately (PM), take part contests, arcade, photo sharing, networking, groups.
• Create your personal profile and bio
• Meet and Chat Live with other members who share similar interests
Registration is simple and fast. Won't take you more than a minute and of course it's completely free.
So Join our Community today!
It's only natural that I can't think of any myself. But threads like this usually throw up some amusing answers.
Top of my head, if it's a title match, the champion is conscious, his opponent is outside, the champion has the right to stop the count out if he wishes. Heels wouldn't stop the counts, babyfaces would.
Like I said, top of my head.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
I'd love to see the World Champion have more control. The commentators and wrestlers always comments on about how important it is to be champion, but we rarely see it. Something along the lines of a champion's choice of who they defend the title against with the options being the top 3-5 stars of the brand. Other things could include refusing to defend the title on free TV. For example, Randy Orton has defended the world title within thirty days, so he refuses to defend the WWE title against Triple H on Raw. So either the match is off or the general manager must turn it to a non-title match. Something small like that could do a lot to capture heel heat. You could even make the opponent's choice match that would precede a PPV match on free TV become a regular legal event. You will give Orton one time to create his opponents match before every PPV title defense.
Any sort of rule where being World Champion actually has an advantage other than having a belt and main event glory.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
I could make a sarcastic answer, but I'm 80% certain somebody would come in and it would completely go over their head. I'd then be subject to their sarcasm.
Belt changes on a count-out. There. I know TNA did it, but they don't any more. It's sort of new.
In the event of a no contest, the challenger gets the title. Similar, but crazier. Better for it.
I could make a sarcastic answer, but I'm 80% certain somebody would come in and it would completely go over their head. I'd then be subject to their sarcasm.
Belt changes on a count-out. There. I know TNA did it, but they don't any more. It's sort of new.
In the event of a no contest, the challenger gets the title. Similar, but crazier. Better for it.
I'd have it slightly different and instead of a count out have it for a DQ which the NWA has done for quite some time and is why Abyss won the title from Sting a few years ago.
__________________
-------------------------------------
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
I'd have it slightly different and instead of a count out have it for a DQ which the NWA has done for quite some time and is why Abyss won the title from Sting a few years ago.
Didn't he get disqualified for pushing the referee during a barbed wired match?
Something new would be if referees actually enforced the rules properly:
No ten count in triple threats
Closed fists lead to disqualification
Only legal men can win tag matches
No getting up on the top rope. Ever.
Holds broken immediately once contact with the ropes is made
Didn't he get disqualified for pushing the referee during a barbed wired match?
Something new would be if referees actually enforced the rules properly:
No ten count in triple threats
Closed fists lead to disqualification
Only legal men can win tag matches
No getting up on the top rope. Ever.
Holds broken immediately once contact with the ropes is made
Etc.
If i remember, it was a normal match between the two and Sting knocked Abyss off the ramp into a barbed wire table which caused the DQ and thats when Abyss won.
__________________
-------------------------------------
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
I think Sting actually took a chair to Abyss to try and keep him down which caused the DQ.
One rule i'd like to see is in Multi man matches the title only changes hands if the champion gets pinned. A lot of people complain about title's changing without the champion losing, this would cut that out.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.