This is a discussion on Wrestling DVD question within the General Pro Wrestling : Classic & General forums, part of the Wrestling Forums category; Just curious which style people prefer. I much prefer the documentary style. With YouTube and similar sites, I can always ...
Welcome to Wrestling Clique Wrestling Forums
Hello and Welcome to WrestlingClique - Wrestling Forums!
We are the premier wrestling forum and your source for wrestling news and rumors, wrestling divas, wrestling gifs, sports discussion, e-feds, writing and more. Wrestling fans participate in active discussion on all the major wrestling leagues and events including WWE, ECW & TNA pay per view events, live wrestling streams, wrestling video games, collectibles, and other wrestling related products and services.
You're currently viewing our site as an unregistered guest which means you are limited to most discussions and features.
Take a few minutes to browse around, and if you like what you see, Register a free account to gain access to :
• Richer content, access forums that are not viewable by the public.
• Complete access to post topics, respond to polls, communicate privately (PM), take part contests, arcade, photo sharing, networking, groups.
• Create your personal profile and bio
• Meet and Chat Live with other members who share similar interests
Registration is simple and fast. Won't take you more than a minute and of course it's completely free.
So Join our Community today!
View Poll Results: Which wrestling DVD porduction style do you prefer?
Just curious which style people prefer. I much prefer the documentary style. With YouTube and similar sites, I can always go back and see a classic match. Documentaries give you access to the real person on a personal level. The actual human being and not the wrestling persona.
I buy DVDs for the matches... don't really care for Docs as much because more often than not (especially with WWE DVDs) you probably aren't getting the real person. I enjoy the wrestlers talking about their thoughts on the matches and their significance, though. I went with combination of both.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
This isn't 1998, just having a documentary is incredibly lame. However, this isn't 1989 either, we should have a video of more than just matches. Unless it's a combination, it's a huge strike against the DVD. The matches is the most important part though.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Combination, without a shadow of a doubt. Some of the newer WWE compliations have had a few thoughs between matches as opposed to a dedicated documentary and have suffered for it.
Great sets like the Flair collections and Bret Hart have a great documentaries in addition to a wide range of matches
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
It depends, I like the combo if it is mostly documentary (like 75%). I HATE the DVD's that are only "Best of" (like The Rock's DVD). The only time I can accept a Best of DVD is if the person has already gotten a documentary DVD before (like Mick Foley and Hulk Hogan).
I just hate that with certain wrestlers we won't get a real documentary because it would ruin their character (like The Undertaker and Kane).
__________________ Help out a struggling college student. Visit and shop for video games at my Amazon-based store, also get Blu-ray Discs: To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
You can also help me out by gifting me Virtual Conole/WiiWare games or sharing PSN games with me (PM me for my info)
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Linear Mode
