Kansas, you silly bastard

Mr. Kennedy · 11-10-2005, 12:39 AM

I'm not saying that there wasn't a person named Jesus(there is evidence of that), i'm just saying that there is no evidence that he is the son of a "god".

Yes some scientists maniuplate data, but the vast majority of the scientific community accepts evolution. The only people who have been lobbying for creationism(and yes, ID is just a new term for creationism) are religious leaders. Evolution is supported by years worth of evidence and data, creationism has has nothing to back it up.

Miakal · 11-10-2005, 12:43 AM

The story of Jesus as the son of god came from a Roman myth well before the existence of him.

The birth of Jesus, the birthdate, the virgin mother, the dying on a cross, passing on to another world. It's all Roman myth.

Dakstang · 11-10-2005, 12:43 AM

Evolution will always be a just a theory to me until some concrete, undisputable evidence is discovered............it'll never happen.

Miakal · 11-10-2005, 12:44 AM

Dak, what do you think of the various fossils showing a progression from ape to man?

What the hell do you think that is?

Dakstang · 11-10-2005, 12:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Miakal

The story of Jesus as the son of god came from a Roman myth well before the existence of him.

The birth of Jesus, the birthdate, the virgin mother, the dying on a cross, passing on to another world. It's all Roman myth.

Oh Miakal, Oh poor misguided Miakal......... :erm2:

Miakal · 11-10-2005, 12:46 AM

It's true. Well before Jesus the exact same story occured. It's not misguided. And we all know early Christians were fond of Roman and Greek myth, that's not misguided either.

Read some books. One of them should be a science book, hahahahha.

Dakstang · 11-10-2005, 12:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Miakal

Dak, what do you think of the various fossils showing a progression from ape to man?

What the hell do you think that is?

My whole argument (as I have stated before) is based on reasonable doubt. Could those fossils have been manipulated by the finders to look like something they are not? Possible. Therefore it leaves reasonable doubt in my mind.

Miakal · 11-10-2005, 12:50 AM

Do you have any idea how many fossils have been found? It would be impossible to manipulate all this evidence.

Dakstang · 11-10-2005, 12:54 AM

I disagree sir.

Miakal · 11-10-2005, 12:55 AM

Who would have more reason to manipulate facts, a religious zealot or a scientist?

11-10-2005, 12:39 AM	#11 (permalink)
Mr. Kennedy Wii #1 Status: Offline Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Rochester, New York Posts: 11,938 vBookie Cash: 500 Rep Power: 15	I'm not saying that there wasn't a person named Jesus(there is evidence of that), i'm just saying that there is no evidence that he is the son of a "god". Yes some scientists maniuplate data, but the vast majority of the scientific community accepts evolution. The only people who have been lobbying for creationism(and yes, ID is just a new term for creationism) are religious leaders. Evolution is supported by years worth of evidence and data, creationism has has nothing to back it up.
	Visit and shop for video games at my Amazon-based store, also get discounted HD DVDs while they last.

11-10-2005, 12:43 AM	#12 (permalink)
Miakal Senior Monk Status: Offline Join Date: Mar 2000 Posts: 10,342 vBookie Cash: 500 Rep Power: 19	The story of Jesus as the son of god came from a Roman myth well before the existence of him. The birth of Jesus, the birthdate, the virgin mother, the dying on a cross, passing on to another world. It's all Roman myth.
	Wrestling News & Rumors - WWE PPV - WWE Discussion - TNA Discussion - Pro Wresting - Wrestling Gifs - Wrestling Streams - Wrestling Divas

11-10-2005, 12:44 AM	#14 (permalink)
Miakal Senior Monk Status: Offline Join Date: Mar 2000 Posts: 10,342 vBookie Cash: 500 Rep Power: 19	Dak, what do you think of the various fossils showing a progression from ape to man? What the hell do you think that is?
	Wrestling News & Rumors - WWE PPV - WWE Discussion - TNA Discussion - Pro Wresting - Wrestling Gifs - Wrestling Streams - Wrestling Divas

11-10-2005, 12:46 AM	#16 (permalink)
Miakal Senior Monk Status: Offline Join Date: Mar 2000 Posts: 10,342 vBookie Cash: 500 Rep Power: 19	It's true. Well before Jesus the exact same story occured. It's not misguided. And we all know early Christians were fond of Roman and Greek myth, that's not misguided either. Read some books. One of them should be a science book, hahahahha.
	Wrestling News & Rumors - WWE PPV - WWE Discussion - TNA Discussion - Pro Wresting - Wrestling Gifs - Wrestling Streams - Wrestling Divas

11-10-2005, 12:50 AM	#18 (permalink)
Miakal Senior Monk Status: Offline Join Date: Mar 2000 Posts: 10,342 vBookie Cash: 500 Rep Power: 19	Do you have any idea how many fossils have been found? It would be impossible to manipulate all this evidence.
	Wrestling News & Rumors - WWE PPV - WWE Discussion - TNA Discussion - Pro Wresting - Wrestling Gifs - Wrestling Streams - Wrestling Divas

11-10-2005, 12:55 AM	#20 (permalink)
Miakal Senior Monk Status: Offline Join Date: Mar 2000 Posts: 10,342 vBookie Cash: 500 Rep Power: 19	Who would have more reason to manipulate facts, a religious zealot or a scientist?
	Wrestling News & Rumors - WWE PPV - WWE Discussion - TNA Discussion - Pro Wresting - Wrestling Gifs - Wrestling Streams - Wrestling Divas

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Stupidest looking WWE Wrestler? Who looks the most silly?	Bouchie	WWE Discussion	16	12-11-2005 12:57 PM
Smackdown in Kansas	Jackie Pies	WWE Discussion	5	05-05-2005 04:45 AM

Kansas, you silly bastard

Kick back and talk about just about anything non wrestling related. You know the drill.