Bradshaws Column on wwe.com

Papa Shango

http://www.wwe.com/news/headlines/1210210


How anyone can believe a word this guy says is beyond me. Lawler is as amusing as Heenan? Taker is a legend because of his feuds with Warrior and Giant Gonzales? The HHH/Nash segment on Raw was great and the best way to garner interest?


Gimme a break.

Drunksader

THis is the same column that ECS cited as evidence that HHH not only jobs to midcarders, but blows them too.

eye cannt spel

[quote:post_uid0]Taker is a legend because of his feuds with Warrior and Giant Gonzales? [/quote:post_uid0]

That is not what he said. Here is how it was written.

"####, just having to work with Giant Gonzalez and Ultimate Warrior alone should land him in the Hall of Fame."

SHOULD land him, Doesnt say, "Did land him."

Papa Shango

Still means the same shit though.. probably the two worst workers in the history of the WWF, and he thinks that matches with them should land him in the hall of fame?


Unless of course he was being sarcastic... which makes you wonder what else he may have been sarcastic about...

eye cannt spel

[quote:post_uid0]Still means the same shit though.. probably the two worst workers in the history of the WWF, and he thinks that matches with them should land him in the hall of fame?
[/quote:post_uid0]

First off, No it doesnt mean the same thing.... Second, Think about this... Taker worked the 2 worst workers in the wwf and done a good job of it.....That doesnt make taker look bad, Just makes him look 100times better....How many times have i heard you say this with Angle, etc. 'Angle could get a good match out of Big Show" Same thing, No Difference at all. Angle is no different from taker, Other than he isnt a hall of famer like taker is/Deserves to be.

Papa Shango

ECS.. if Takers matches with those people were GOOD then you would have a valid point. All of the Taker/Warrior encounters were pathetic.. and the Gonzales match at WM9 was one of the worst in history.. how the #### should THAT land you in the hall of fame.

eye cannt spel

That alone shouldn't. But when a guy can carry a HORRIBLE worker (the likes of Warrior or that other jackass) To a Decent,Believeable match. I think that says something for the guy (In the case, Taker.)

Papa Shango

But did you ever watch his series of matches between Taker and Warrior? Most of which were horrible tag Matches like the Warrior and Jim Duggan vs Taker and the Bezerker... the rest of the stuff was just run ins during squash matches on Superstars.

Honestly ECS, im not just saying this for the sake of contradiction.. but the warrior and gonzales feuds were just appauling in every way.

Taker does deserve to be a Hall of famer no doubt about it.. he carried the company on his back for a few years and remained loyal when everyone else went on an exodus to WCW.

Bradshaw just used a terrible example

Dr. Giganto

Sports Moderator

i think it was more of a shot at giant gonzalez and the warrior than anything else. i think bradshaw means that taker should get some respect just because of the embarrassment of having to "feud" with those two. i thought the sarcasm was very evident

Papa Shango

I was hoping someone would pick up on the sarcasm.. like i said.. it makes you think what other things he was being Sarcastic about.