|
|
General Discussion Kick back and talk about just about anything non wrestling related. You know the drill. |
|
| Welcome to the Wrestling Clique Wrestling Forums. |
 |
 |  |
 |
|
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-24-2003, 03:23 AM
| #12 (permalink) | |
| Platinum Member
 Status: Offline
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,979
vBookie Cash: 500
Rep Power: 14  | I am going with the Titans like I always do ;) | |
   XBL: Spinoff90 | Xfire: spinoff90 | PSN: Hayabusa85 | Wii: 2666 8965 0459 0136 My Photobucket Album Of Collections etc. | IGN Collection List | DVD/Blu-Ray Collection List | ||
 |
1st|
10-24-2003, 09:37 AM
| #13 (permalink) | |
|
Founder/Admin
Perfect !!
Status: Offline
Join Date: May 2003 Location: City of Champions
Posts: 22,143
vBookie Cash: 100000
Rep Power: 87  gXboxLive Leaderboard: 42nd | [quote:post_uid0="Miakal"]I don't think the Giants offense will even make it to this Sunday for The Vikings.[/quote:post_uid0] I was at that game and it was miserable outside. Freezing cold rain for 6 straight hours. Weather definetly played a factor in that game. Also Miakal, they are starting 4 rookies. More than any other team in the NFL. Giddy up. P.S. The Giants DO suck. And Shockey is part of the reason. I have never seen such an overrated juice bag in all my life. 2 TD's last year and he acts like he saved the franchise. He's just a punk. | |
| | ||
| |
|
10-24-2003, 10:50 AM
| #14 (permalink) | |
| Formerly "Tom Dogg"
Status:
Online
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: New York City
Posts: 11,458
vBookie Cash: 100
Rep Power: 42 | Shockey is the reason Toomer, Collins, and Barber all had such great years last year. He is such a receiving threat from a non-WR position, that defenses had to key on him, opening things up for the other giant receivers (which was huge when Ike Hilliard went down in the middle of last season) and the running game. His numbers last year would be average for a wide receiver, but were phenomenal for a tight end, and a rookie at that. This year, he's on pace for 91 catches, 859 yards, and 5 TD's. i'll take that from my tight end anyday also, whos starting 4 rookies, the giants or pats? i lost track of the thread :p | |
| | ||
| |
|
10-24-2003, 02:15 PM
| #15 (permalink) | |
| Platinum Member
Status:
Online
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 5,266
vBookie Cash: 100
Rep Power: 24 | [quote:post_uid8="Simon"]New England.[/quote:post_uid8] Yeah, and my pick is Green Bay. Hah. Homer. Most of the predictions in here seem to be pretty valid, but then it's the NFL and every team has a chance. You could have called the Vikings unproven before last week, but they went out and beat the Broncos, which is big. On offense they have the biggest O-line in the league to go along with one of the top 3 QB/WR tandems, three solid running backs, and one of the best blocking fullback/tight ends in the NFL. And that's just their offense. They have playermakers on defense, and have looked great. And I despise the Vikings. The Giants are done without Will Allen (it was Allen right?). | |
| |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
| | |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Lost Superbowl Bet | Randy Orton | Real Media | 6 | 02-06-2007 07:38 PM |
| The Superbowl Shuffle | Randy Orton | Real Media | 2 | 01-22-2007 03:29 PM |
| Superbowl 41 | Mr NFL | North American Sports | 15 | 12-03-2006 10:04 AM |
| My first Superbowl | Tyler Durden | North American Sports | 28 | 02-07-2006 05:39 PM |
