This is a discussion on Quinn angry at Gordon reports within the European Sports forums, part of the Sports Forums category; ...
Welcome to Wrestling Clique Wrestling Forums
Hello and Welcome to WrestlingClique - Wrestling Forums!
We are the premier wrestling forum and your source for wrestling news and rumors, wrestling divas, wrestling gifs, sports discussion, e-feds, writing and more. Wrestling fans participate in active discussion on all the major wrestling leagues and events including WWE, ECW & TNA pay per view events, live wrestling streams, wrestling video games, collectibles, and other wrestling related products and services.
You're currently viewing our site as an unregistered guest which means you are limited to most discussions and features.
Take a few minutes to browse around, and if you like what you see, Register a free account to gain access to :
• Richer content, access forums that are not viewable by the public.
• Complete access to post topics, respond to polls, communicate privately (PM), take part contests, arcade, photo sharing, networking, groups.
• Create your personal profile and bio
• Meet and Chat Live with other members who share similar interests
Registration is simple and fast. Won't take you more than a minute and of course it's completely free.
So Join our Community today!
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 20 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Sunderland chairman Niall Quinn has issued an angry denial of claims Craig Gordon is not in the side over a payment clause.
Gordon has played 49 times for The Black Cats since his 2007 move from Hearts, and his new club will have to pay £330,000 if he plays a further game due to the conditions set out in the transfer agreement.
And, as the Scotland international has not played since the 1-0 victory over Hull last month, there have been suggestions Sunderland are reluctant to pay out.
However, Gordon’s late withdrawal before the game against West Brom was the result of a knee injury and Quinn is furious about the suggestion there was a financial motive.
I just find it funny that a goalkeeper that you spent so much money on is getting beaten to first team football by a keeper that you were angry Stoke pulled out of buying at the time.
__________________
------------------------------
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
------------------------------------------------
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
I don't know about your financial situation, just thought I would post the story for you Mikkelas.
Yeah i read about it already on the sunderland forums a few days back To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 20 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
__________________
-------------------------------------
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Linear Mode
