This is a discussion on Refs want red card clarification within the European Sports forums, part of the Sports Forums category; Originally Posted by BBC Sport
Refs want red card clarification
To view links or images in this forum your post ...
Welcome to Wrestling Clique Wrestling Forums
Hello and Welcome to WrestlingClique - Wrestling Forums!
We are the premier wrestling forum and your source for wrestling news and rumors, wrestling divas, wrestling gifs, sports discussion, e-feds, writing and more. Wrestling fans participate in active discussion on all the major wrestling leagues and events including WWE, ECW & TNA pay per view events, live wrestling streams, wrestling video games, collectibles, and other wrestling related products and services.
You're currently viewing our site as an unregistered guest which means you are limited to most discussions and features.
Take a few minutes to browse around, and if you like what you see, Register a free account to gain access to :
• Richer content, access forums that are not viewable by the public.
• Complete access to post topics, respond to polls, communicate privately (PM), take part contests, arcade, photo sharing, networking, groups.
• Create your personal profile and bio
• Meet and Chat Live with other members who share similar interests
Registration is simple and fast. Won't take you more than a minute and of course it's completely free.
So Join our Community today!
Well that's what the refs are saying, he was trying to get out of the way but there was still contact, it is common sense but they just want a clarification I guess,
__________________
------------------------------
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
------------------------------------------------
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Well the refs are told that because its a foul and he's the last man in a clear goalscoring opportunity, the keeper has to go, but the rule should specify intent. I guess they want clarification because by the letter of the law, he had to go once the penalty was awarded, which is ridiculous.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
It is, but rules are there to be followed and they were only following the rules and then I guess they feel a little underminded when it gets rescinded.
__________________
------------------------------
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
------------------------------------------------
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.