| So is TNA really behind the times?
After Vince McMahon accused TNA wrestling of being 'behind the times', even describing some of the things they do on TV as 'reprehensible', do you think TNA's product is out of touch with today? They certainly seem to be aiming at a more attitude-era-esque product than the current WWE product, with a more edgy feel, but do you think this is the right path to go down? There are obviously pros and cons, but what would you be aiming for if you were booking TNA? Should they tone it down?
"A few weeks prior to signing with WCW, I witnessed Hogan wrestle Flair on Nitro. Now strictly from a fan perspective, it was very hard to watch. What I witnessed that night was two legends that were shells of their former selves still trying to do it. Watching Hogan & Flair that night just wasn't right. In my opinion the bookers were just exploiting them to try to pop a number. It was a desperate situation and that's exactly the way it came across on TV."
- Vince Russo, Rope Opera  Tom says:
Are you saying you would watch Punk fuck a bald chick in a porno?
Ken says:
I'm saying I'd watch Punk alone in a porno. |