| Not all is well in the WWE. As the internet wrestling community generally agrees, WWE is going through a bad stage. Some may say we're experiencing a "down-cycle" (Though I don't buy that crap).
So how does WWE remedy the situation? Do they fire the ream of talentless stars in their roster such as Test, Albert, and others, to replace them with more talented (And some rejected by WWE) such as Jerry Lynn and Essa Rios?
Are they firing the wrong people? Are they hiring the right people?
Do they foot the blame at the creative department? They can't write themselves out of a paper bag at the moment.
Do the McMahons step back from their product, and let others remedy their problems instead of filling the shows with repetitive promos from Vince?
Is the presentation of the programming not up to proper standard? Do Raw and Smackdown need an overhaul? Or do we need two entirely new flagship programmes?
Do they need to build for long term more? Or is adding more big name stars the real answer? Do you enjoy the returns of veterans and main eventers?
Explain where your gripes with WWE lie, in true depth. We know the WWE do raid the site regularly, so maybe they'll see what we post, and try to rectify it. I doubt it VERY much, but still, I reckon it'll be good to vent all their crappiness in its full, polished turd glory. |