View Single Post
Old 02-19-2008, 02:10 PM   #28 (permalink)
God
Super Moderator
Rock out wit cha Knockout
God's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 9,164
vBookie Cash: 260000
Rep Power: 59 God is a Hall Of FamerGod is a Hall Of FamerGod is a Hall Of FamerGod is a Hall Of FamerGod is a Hall Of FamerGod is a Hall Of FamerGod is a Hall Of FamerGod is a Hall Of FamerGod is a Hall Of FamerGod is a Hall Of FamerGod is a Hall Of Famer


Awards Showcase

Be The Booker Be The Booker Clique Fantasy Wrestling Clique Fantasy Wrestling Be The Booker Best Thread Starter 
Total Awards: 6
Re: TNA Impact sucks

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crocker View Post
Ok heres a look at the Impact ratings recently

Feb 14th 1.1
Fab 7th 1.11
Jan 31st 1.0
Jan 24th 0.8

And after picking out a random issue of Powerslam magazine here are some ratings from last year

July 12th 1.01
July 19th 1.17
July 26th 1.13
Aug 2ns 1.07

Now I fail to see any increase in ratings there, basically like Tyler said it the same fans tuning in now as it was then. I compare these set of fans to the fans of the original fans of ECW, these guys will tune in weather its a good show or a bad show, they are die hard TNA fans.
Firstly, wherever you got those ratings from (The recent ones) I would delete the link.

The actual ratings are:
Janurary 24th, 20081.2
Janurary 31st, 20081.2
Feburary 7th, 20081.1
Feburary 14th, 20081.1


I'll do a random date comparrision.

iMPACT! first aired in October. The first edition got 0.8, with an average for the year of around 0.8. The same week next year got 0.9 with an average of 0.9/1.0. The same week last October got 1.1 with an average for the year at 1.1.

Now lets see, 0.8 to 0.9 to 1.1. Yeah your right, its staying the exact same.

Lets take another week at random, from only a few weeks ago, the third week in January. 2006 was 0.9, 2007 was 1.1, 2008 was 1.2.

Thats 0.9 to 1.1 to 1.2, Again your right its staying the exact same. Not changing at all.

The polar opposite now, thrid last week of the year. 2005 got 0.7, 2006 got 1.2, 2007 also got 1.2.

Now a random date from the middle of the year. First week of May. 2006 got 0.9, 2007 got 1.0.

Again its the exact same number!!

Thats four dates i took at random. Each time the ratings have imrpved from the previous year. The dates you posted must have been one of the only time they stayed the same. And no, im not going thru the entire year week by week to compare. I took random dates & compared year by year, not made up ratings (0.8? When it got 1.2!) & comparing them to last summer.


I dont want to take what you can give...
I would rather starve than eat your bread...
I would rather run but I cant walk...
Guess Ill lie alone just like before...