Quote:
Originally Posted by Necro  a 35 year old with bad knees is in the prime of his career? Am I missing something...
his career has been hall of fame worthy obviously, but I mean come on I wouldn't say he's in the prime. I'd say it's going to go down hill from here on out...
and before someone snaps obviously i know the stats, and that he's still putting up great numbers, but this year he's been injured, and not the hall of fame harrison. Thats all I'm saying. He clearly can have several hall of fame seasons again no question, but on this day I think the game would have ended in a similar fashion. |
BRAVO and exactly how I feel on this one.
Is Harrison a great all time player - YES. Has he had an off year due to his injuries - YES. Has his replacement been playing REALLY well - YES. So BACK TO THE ORIGINAL QUESTION of "
Colts only lost because Marvin Harrison didn't play" and I say NO to that. THEY WERE WINNING. They should have won. they were up by 10 in the 4th. THEIR DEFENSE could not stop Brady and the Pats.
** Last I checked Harrison, even 100% healthy, DOES NOT PLAY DEFENSE....