Blitzkrieg

Freak, my whole point about the Jazz is that while they never won a championship in the "God Bless the old NBA", they were still great enough to hand the Lakers their ass two years in a row.. The SAME Lakers team that are better then these current Spurs. It might have been Kobe's 1st two years.. but he was good enough to make the all-star game wasn't he? Along with teammates.. Shaq, Eddie Jones, and Van Exel.. all in the same year.

So yes, I'm downing the Lakers and I'm downing the Spurs because neither are better then a Jazz team that never won a championship.

Keep in mind, when the Jazz won those series against the Lakers, Stockton and Malone were already old as hell..

And what I said about the Bulls is that they never screwed around in the early rounds..

Why did you bring up the Pacers and Knicks? My point was about the early rounds. Those were Eastern Conference Finals.. not the 1st round. They were also great teams.

The Spurs just last year had all they could handle with the SaC Kings in the 1st round, they've lost games in the 1st round to a Marbury-led Phoenix team, and lets not forget how they blew game 7 last year to the Mavericks on their home court.

You talk about how the Spurs are so unbeatable.. I'm just bringing up a lot of instances where they haven't matched what you've claimed.

Weakest "dynasty" or run or whatever you want to call it I've ever seen.

It's almost as bad as people trying to say the Patriots could beat the old Niner and Cowboys teams when surely.. They could not.