View Single Post
Old 07-07-2005, 04:26 AM   #9 (permalink)
The Phantom
Platinum Member
The Phantom's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Join Date: Jun 2004
My Local Time: 09:32 AM
Location: Cardiff, Wales
Posts: 8,825
vBookie Cash: 7800
Casino Cash: $761
Rep Power: 29 The Phantom is World ChampionThe Phantom is World ChampionThe Phantom is World ChampionThe Phantom is World ChampionThe Phantom is World ChampionThe Phantom is World ChampionThe Phantom is World ChampionThe Phantom is World ChampionThe Phantom is World ChampionThe Phantom is World ChampionThe Phantom is World Champion

Points: 26,177, Level: 70
Points: 26,177, Level: 70 Points: 26,177, Level: 70 Points: 26,177, Level: 70
Activity: 4%
Activity: 4% Activity: 4% Activity: 4%

Awards Showcase

NFL Survivor 
Total Awards: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mister D
i agree to an extent, but the problem is that this isnt always how it works, especially in the NBA.

Teams draft high school kids expecting them to be good in 4-5 years (when they would have graduated college normally). So the question remains, would these kids be better served playing college ball and being a starter for 4 years (or at least one or two), or is it better for them to play 2 minutes a night in the pros? The rule is almost saving these kids from themselves. not to mention that it helps teams pick players based on how good they are, and not how good they expect them to be.
I see your point and would and would probably agree with it. I was talking mainly from from a british stand point and for individual sports, as my knowlage about draft picks and the whole collage system over in north america is very limated.
  Reply With Quote