Quote:
| He has had way to many title reigns. I wouldn't put it back on him for at least a year because he's been stale for more than 3 years now. |
That would mean he was stale in 2006, which he quite clearly wasn't...
I agree he is stale now, but it is only really since his involvement with Vickie that he became stale. Obviously he has had far too many reigns and a look at Edge's title history pretty much sums up how meaningless the belts have become in modern day WWE. They are basically just passed around constantly with no real though put into it and no real meaning to any of the reigns, and Edge has won the title in similar BS fashion so many times that it's beyond boring now. Not one of his reigns has really been memorable or meant anything besides the one that elevated him in the first place, and even that only lasted 3 weeks.
I would say he deserves a long reign, but at this stage I just want him to be involved in a non title feud (when he returns). I'd like to see him get a fairly lengthy face turn in time though.
His most ridiculous reign was definitely the one late last year when he won it from Triple H is BS fashion then lost it to Hardy the next month just so Triple H still looked like the best on the brand despite not holding gold.
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 20 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.