Wrestling Forums : WWE, TNA, ECW, E-Fed, Wrestlemania, Live Wrestling Streams - View Single Post

TheBoogeyMan · 07-03-2009, 06:35 AM

Mainstream wrestling in general has an issue with keeping a belt on someone for more than a few months. Especially the world title, which is in a constant state of flux. Since the World title came into play in 2003, only Triple H and Batista have had reigns longer than 6 months. With the WWE championship, since 1997, only Cena, HHH, Orton, and JBL have had reigns longer than 6 months. Its just how mainstream wrestling works, belts are never in a fixed spot for a long time. I just dont see them stick the belt on Edge for an extended period of time. With how much they move the belts around, they basically are a joke as it is. They really dont mean as much as they did 10-15 years ago.

07-03-2009, 06:35 AM	#8 (permalink)
TheBoogeyMan WC's Music Review Guy Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Milwaukee, WI Posts: 457 vCash: 500 Rep Power: 13	Re: Edge has too many world titles. Mainstream wrestling in general has an issue with keeping a belt on someone for more than a few months. Especially the world title, which is in a constant state of flux. Since the World title came into play in 2003, only Triple H and Batista have had reigns longer than 6 months. With the WWE championship, since 1997, only Cena, HHH, Orton, and JBL have had reigns longer than 6 months. Its just how mainstream wrestling works, belts are never in a fixed spot for a long time. I just dont see them stick the belt on Edge for an extended period of time. With how much they move the belts around, they basically are a joke as it is. They really dont mean as much as they did 10-15 years ago.