Roxy

Exactly.

The problem with Maryse is that nobody really cares that she's champion. She has a fantastic character, she has bags of charisma, but that doesn't get any heat, and she's a heel. The whole point of being a heel is to get the crowd to hate you, Maryse gets wolf whistles, and cheers from guys. Right now, the title is just an accessory to her ring attire. If you get no reaction, then the crowd doesn't care. My problem with people is that they treat the title like crap. Fair enough it looks really stereotypical, but it's a new title, and people would moan that one title between three shows was stupid. If you didn't have two titles, then one show would have a focus, and the other wouldn't.

I can see Maryse going over Mickie at Night of Champions simply because Maryse still needs to establish herself. If the rumours that Vince is high on Maryse are true, then i'll double those odds. Mickie will end up with the title, maybe at Raw the next night, but either way, I think Maryse has got this in the bag. Mickie went over over twice *highlight for spoiler* actually three times because of Raw next week. You don't do that for nothing, because with Mickie going over like that already, it weakens the champion, and it also makes the win alot less meaningful.

As for holding both titles, it's a real big shame that Mickie wasn't the first to hold both. Michelle McCool technically beat Mickie James, they where indirectly competiting to hold both, but if you notice, Michelle was the one pushing the history thing, not Mickie. Whilst on commentary, Mickie was pushing Maryse being afraid of her, and that goes back to my other post, it's not a typical 'Me want title' feud. Michelle beat Mickie, and she didn't even do it in an exciting way.

__________________