| Re: Do You Like Legacy? Orton was amazing around the time when he kicked McMahon in the head. He was the best thing the WWE had going for them. I've slowly lost interest in his character since then.
I cannot take Chicken Legs Rhodes seriously. Maybe I'm harsh on him but I feel if his name was Cody Andrews and he was not related to Dusty he would not be anywhere near the WWE for at least another 4-8 years if at all. I find him boring in the ring and even more boring on the microphone.
Ted Dibiase has the "it" factor. He also has a decent physique on a good frame. I haven't really seen him in any big time matches, nor have I seen him do anything promo wise beside his recent thing with Orton and his debut promos but he seems pretty solid on the mic for a younger guy. I'll reserve judgment on his actual in ring ability until I see him in some actual one on one PPV matches.
As a stable, I don't think Legacy is anywhere near where Evolution was. Evolution is up as one of the top stables ever. It was just at a low point in wrestlings popularity so it won't get it's props. It lead to one of the best WrestleMania/Rumble storylines in recent memory which was Batista/HHH. Also, they always were booked with credability. Legacy is not. I understand that neither Dibiase or Rhodes should be able to beat Batista, or HHH one on one but constantly being taken out despite gang attacking one guy ruins it for me.
__________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|