Quote:
| As for politics, the whole argument for that is flawed. Most people get their information from dirt-sheets, sites which mainly put up half-truths and fake or exaggerrated stories. Next, Taker is a respected guy backstage, and is pretty much against politics to get you further in the company (ie; getting pushes, title reigns). That is a major problem with the argument with politics, why would Taker use something he is against? He is a well know figure-head backstage, he's hardly in the title hunt, rarely main-evented mania when he deserved it, and occasionally jobs - that alone tells you that he isn't a 'nasty' politician, so why would he do it for Michelle? Michelle has tried to be pushed for WWE for years, way before her title reign, and way before becoming head of the Smackdown Divas. |
I know that Takeer has never taken advantage for himself, but it's different when it comes to someone outside yourself. I'm not saying you're wrong cos honestly I don't know either way, but I find it hard to believe that she went from nobody, to Champion in the space of twelve months without help.
As for wrestling style and looks, I'll agree that it's all opinion.