Quote:
| No matter what anyone says, I'll likely never accept Michelle as a good thing. I'll admit she'd improved since first arriving, but her position as a former Champion and head of the Smackdown Divas simply comes down to who she's sleeping with and I will never respect that. Ever. |
Fair enough, but sleeping with someone doesn't mean you're not talented. That and Michelle was being groomed to become Champion all last year. The title itself was made for Torie Wilson, but she retired, therefore Michelle had to take it. She was 'head' of the Smackdown Divas quite simply because there wasn't anyone else on there (face-wise), who could wrestle as well as her, the rest where heels; Victoria was a jobber, and Nattie had only just arrived.
As for politics, the whole argument for that is flawed. Most people get their information from dirt-sheets, sites which mainly put up half-truths and fake or exaggerrated stories. Next, Taker is a respected guy backstage, and is pretty much against politics to get you further in the company (ie; getting pushes, title reigns). That is a major problem with the argument with politics, why would Taker use something he is against? He is a well know figure-head backstage, he's hardly in the title hunt, rarely main-evented mania when he deserved it, and occasionally jobs - that alone tells you that he isn't a 'nasty' politician, so why would he do it for Michelle? Michelle has tried to be pushed for WWE for years, way before her title reign, and way before becoming head of the Smackdown Divas.