Wrestling Forums : WWE, TNA, ECW, E-Fed, Wrestlemania, Live Wrestling Streams - View Single Post - Isn't The World Title Supposed To Be Important?

Y 2 Jake · 06-24-2009, 09:11 AM

I don't see what difference that really makes. There isn't much to remember about the final 18 months of WCW. At least that title win get's people like us talking and if it wasn't for that title win then WCW would've died sooner. Not by going out of business, but by being a crappy promotion in which nothing intresting happened. Wrestling forums wouldn't be as dead as they are now if there was a champion like David Arquette.

The match in which he lost the belt was also very entertaiing. Which in my eyes makes his title reign more of a success than most, considering some World Champions put on shit match after shit match.

06-24-2009, 09:11 AM	#23 (permalink)
Y 2 Jake Petit Filous Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Stoke-on-Trent Posts: 1,156 vCash: 1000 Rep Power: 22 Awards Showcase Total Awards: 1	Re: Isn't The World Title Supposed To Be Important? I don't see what difference that really makes. There isn't much to remember about the final 18 months of WCW. At least that title win get's people like us talking and if it wasn't for that title win then WCW would've died sooner. Not by going out of business, but by being a crappy promotion in which nothing intresting happened. Wrestling forums wouldn't be as dead as they are now if there was a champion like David Arquette. The match in which he lost the belt was also very entertaiing. Which in my eyes makes his title reign more of a success than most, considering some World Champions put on shit match after shit match. __________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.