Quote:
| Yes and no. If the motivation is sufficiently explained, then it could make some sense. In a way, its kind of like Andre winning the belt and then handing it to DiBiase for cash.
As a whole, TNA does a far better job of making their title seem important than the WWE does. To me, having a belt change hands every month does more to devalue it than a screwy title change like last night on the PPV. |
I agree that they definitely do a better job of making it seem big than WWE, and this is helped by the fact that there is only one World Title so only one person can be the man, but I think last night's finish is pretty retarded no matter what the explanation is.
As far as I'm concerned the World Title should be the ultimate dream of any wrestler, and Joe giving the belt to Angle to me says that the belt isn't that important to him, which obviously harms its credibility to a certain degree.
Still better than all WWE's title changes though.