Wrestling Forums : WWE, TNA, ECW, E-Fed, Wrestlemania, Live Wrestling Streams - View Single Post - Can someone PLEASE explain to me this whole MEM thing???

iamthedestroyer · 06-19-2009, 08:41 PM

The MEM was an epic fail. It did nothing to get any younger guys over, and just degenerated to the point where it was contradicting considering Frontline had mostly older guys in it as well.

TNA needs to completely reboot their product creatively. TNA should be centered around making new stars to feud with Angle, Sting, and to a lesser extent Booker T.

Steiner, Jarret, Nash, and Foley should all be regulated to non wrestling roles. They are far too old to provide anything good in the ring, and they won't really help draw any new fans in.

Angle and Sting are still competetant enough in the ring, and still credible enough with mainstream wrestling fans (IE they aren't considered to be a stain on WWE's tampon that they disposed of last month) that if somebody was flipping channels and saw one of these guys on TNA they'd assume TNA has got to be legit because a HUGE star is on their show. It is simply up to TNA to provide an undercard/fresh faced Main Event product that is actually intriguing from a creative standpoint.

06-19-2009, 08:41 PM	#8 (permalink)
iamthedestroyer WWE 2K10 Be The Booker Join Date: May 2009 Posts: 1,079 vCash: 500 Rep Power: 105 Awards Showcase Total Awards: 1	Re: Can someone PLEASE explain to me this whole MEM thing??? The MEM was an epic fail. It did nothing to get any younger guys over, and just degenerated to the point where it was contradicting considering Frontline had mostly older guys in it as well. TNA needs to completely reboot their product creatively. TNA should be centered around making new stars to feud with Angle, Sting, and to a lesser extent Booker T. Steiner, Jarret, Nash, and Foley should all be regulated to non wrestling roles. They are far too old to provide anything good in the ring, and they won't really help draw any new fans in. Angle and Sting are still competetant enough in the ring, and still credible enough with mainstream wrestling fans (IE they aren't considered to be a stain on WWE's tampon that they disposed of last month) that if somebody was flipping channels and saw one of these guys on TNA they'd assume TNA has got to be legit because a HUGE star is on their show. It is simply up to TNA to provide an undercard/fresh faced Main Event product that is actually intriguing from a creative standpoint. __________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.