| Re: Wrestlemania 23: Batista/Undertaker or Cena/Michaels?
Cena/HBK got more love at the time, though since then people's opinions of it have dwindled slightly, more so because they had a better match on RAW than anything.
I prefer Batista/Undertaker too, but I wouldn't say Cena's selling was bad in the match at all. He sold it just fine for what HBK had done to it, the problem was that HBK forgot all about it after that, which made it a waste of time and pointless.
Batista/Undertaker didn't waste any time or screw around with stuff that went non where. They had an intense, heat-filled brawl that managed to elevated both men in the process.
__________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|