Quote:
| So guys tell me what you think of these booking ideas in TNA right now, and if they would make better sense than what we get at the moment.
1) Kurt Angle gets the title of Mick Foley and feuds with Daniels for it. It wrights its self. Angle could talk about how hes an olypian, world champion, and the greatest in the world while Daniels is a nobody, was fired, never won a world title, and has had a forgetable career. Daniels says that he risked his TNA contract once and lost, and swoar never to do it again, but he's changed, and he is willing to risk everything to realise his dream. Drag it out, with the contract stip on the blow off, and put Daniels over. That was the plan for the MEM storyline all along right?
|
That's not really a good idea. First off, if the aim is to increase ratings you've gotta imagine more casual non TNA fans would tune in. To the casual fanbase Danielson=Generic Looking Skinny Guy, Angle=Former WWE Champion. If a former WWE Champion calls some guy these casual fans have never seen before a jobber, they will believe it. Next if they continue to tune in and Daniels defeats Angle, it looks like Angle just lost to a jobber who is a nobody and has had a forgettable career.
Second, putting Daniels over doesn't accomplish much. Daniels is in the same age range as Kurt Angle. Meaning he isn't younger talent, he is just an older guy who only began to achieve "national" recognition when he came to TNA. I say national lightly as TNA really doesn't have that much of a reach.
If they want to put over younger guys to be stars in the company for the next 5-10 years Daniels is the wrong pick. He is older, and having Kurt Angle call him a nobody and a jobber won't help get him over.